Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line, LP Form 10-Q - 06/30/05
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D. C. 20549
_______________
FORM
10-Q
For
the quarterly period ended
June
30, 2005
Commission
File No. 1-2921
_______________
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
44-0382470 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S.
Employer |
incorporation
or organization) |
Identification
No.) |
|
|
|
|
5444
Westheimer Road |
77056-5306 |
Houston,
Texas |
(Zip
Code) |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (713)
989-7000
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each Class |
|
Name
of each exchange in which registered |
4.80%
Senior Notes due 2008, Series B |
|
New
York Stock Exchange |
6.05%
Senior Notes due 2013, Series B |
|
New
York Stock Exchange |
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes ü No
___
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an Accelerated Filer (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12D-2).
Yes No ü
Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line, LP meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions
H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the
reduced disclosure format. Item 2 of Part I has been reduced and Items 2, 3 and
4 of Part II have been omitted in accordance with Instruction
H.
FORM
10-Q
June
30, 2005
Index
|
Page(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8-21
|
|
|
|
22-30 |
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30-31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
and storage of natural gas |
|
$ |
94,742 |
|
$ |
91,904 |
|
LNG
terminalling revenue |
|
|
13,561
|
|
|
14,081
|
|
Other
revenue |
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
Total
operating revenue |
|
|
110,421
|
|
|
108,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation,
maintenance and general |
|
|
48,132
|
|
|
52,584
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
15,025
|
|
|
14,876
|
|
Taxes,
other than on income |
|
|
6,869
|
|
|
6,674
|
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
70,026
|
|
|
74,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income |
|
|
40,395
|
|
|
34,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
(11,499 |
) |
|
(12,024 |
) |
Other,
net |
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
626
|
|
Total
other income (expense) |
|
|
(9,650 |
) |
|
(11,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
before income taxes |
|
|
30,745
|
|
|
22,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes |
|
|
12,075
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
$ |
18,670 |
|
$ |
14,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
and storage of natural gas |
|
$ |
214,762 |
|
$ |
213,764 |
|
LNG
terminalling revenue |
|
|
26,769
|
|
|
27,843
|
|
Other
revenue |
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
Total
operating revenue |
|
|
245,821
|
|
|
246,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation,
maintenance and general |
|
|
98,315
|
|
|
102,309
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
30,392
|
|
|
30,023
|
|
Taxes,
other than on income |
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
142,912
|
|
|
146,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income |
|
|
102,909
|
|
|
99,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
(23,347 |
) |
|
(24,179 |
) |
Other,
net |
|
|
2,746
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Total
other income (expense) |
|
|
(20,601 |
) |
|
(22,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
before income taxes |
|
|
82,308
|
|
|
77,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes |
|
|
32,168
|
|
|
29,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
$ |
50,140 |
|
$ |
47,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
|
|
June
30, 2005 |
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
Plant
in service |
|
$ |
1,974,845 |
|
$ |
1,947,524 |
|
Construction
work-in-progress |
|
|
263,430
|
|
|
203,094
|
|
|
|
|
2,238,275
|
|
|
2,150,618
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
114,934
|
|
|
87,683
|
|
Net
property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2,123,341
|
|
|
2,062,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
in affiliate |
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
611
|
|
|
26,054
|
|
Accounts
receivable, less allowances of $1,219 and $1,289, respectively
|
|
|
39,622
|
|
|
48,085
|
|
Accounts
receivable - related parties |
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
Gas
imbalances - receivable |
|
|
31,914
|
|
|
36,122
|
|
System
gas and operating supplies |
|
|
113,581
|
|
|
98,250
|
|
Deferred
income taxes, net |
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
10,698
|
|
Note
receivable - Southern Union |
|
|
65,761
|
|
|
90,745
|
|
Other |
|
|
7,178
|
|
|
11,646
|
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
269,687
|
|
|
328,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles,
net |
|
|
8,262
|
|
|
8,496
|
|
Restricted
cash |
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Debt
issuance cost |
|
|
4,263
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
Non-current
note receivable - Southern Union |
|
|
69,294
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-current
system gas |
|
|
26,875
|
|
|
30,471
|
|
Other |
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
2,507,373 |
|
$ |
2,440,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
|
|
June
30, 2005 |
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
Owners'
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Partners'
capital |
|
$ |
852,546 |
|
$ |
802,406 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
Tax
sharing note receivable - Southern Union |
|
|
(57,051 |
) |
|
(70,971 |
) |
Total
owners' equity |
|
|
797,387
|
|
|
732,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt |
|
|
1,181,045
|
|
|
1,174,065
|
|
Total
capitalization |
|
|
1,978,432
|
|
|
1,906,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt |
|
|
-
|
|
|
12,548
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
Accounts
payable - overdrafts |
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
20,103
|
|
Accounts
payable - related parties |
|
|
12,290
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
Gas
imbalances - payable |
|
|
101,840
|
|
|
102,567
|
|
Accrued
taxes |
|
|
13,362
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
Accrued
interest |
|
|
18,847
|
|
|
19,119
|
|
Other |
|
|
86,137
|
|
|
85,239
|
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
247,366
|
|
|
257,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
income taxes, net |
|
|
184,333
|
|
|
172,193
|
|
Post-retirement
benefits |
|
|
29,274
|
|
|
30,449
|
|
Other |
|
|
67,968
|
|
|
73,534
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
owners' equity and liabilities |
|
$ |
2,507,373 |
|
$ |
2,440,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From (Used In) Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
$ |
50,140 |
|
$ |
47,201 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
30,392
|
|
|
30,023
|
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
23,695
|
|
Debt
premium and discount amortization, net |
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
(3,522 |
) |
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
8,877
|
|
|
13,368
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
5,570
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
Gas
imbalances - receivable |
|
|
563
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Other
assets |
|
|
3,107
|
|
|
847
|
|
Payables |
|
|
12,715
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
Accrued
taxes |
|
|
16,533
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
Interest
accrued |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
(1,343 |
) |
Gas
imbalances - payable |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
396
|
|
Other
liabilities |
|
|
(13,564 |
) |
|
(5,489 |
) |
Net
cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
131,108
|
|
|
112,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows Used In Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in Note receivable - Southern Union |
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
(98,535 |
) |
Capital
and investment expenditures |
|
|
(96,139 |
) |
|
(62,735 |
) |
Purchase
of system gas, net |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
(14 |
) |
Retirements
and other |
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
(441 |
) |
Net
cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(140,861 |
) |
|
(161,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From (Used In) Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in bank overdrafts |
|
|
(12,565 |
) |
|
1,152
|
|
Debt
issuance |
|
|
255,626
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Debt
retirements |
|
|
(258,433 |
) |
|
(151,723 |
) |
Debt
issuance costs |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
(1,050 |
) |
Net
cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(15,690 |
) |
|
48,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(25,443 |
) |
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
26,054
|
|
|
16,810
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
611 |
|
$ |
15,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
(net of interest rate swap and amounts capitalized) |
|
$ |
33,174 |
|
$ |
35,214 |
|
Income
taxes (net of refunds) |
|
|
-
|
|
|
1
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OWNERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Partners'
Capital |
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Tax
Sharing Note Receivable-Southern Union |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
January 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
802,406 |
|
$ |
1,231 |
|
$ |
(70,971 |
) |
$ |
732,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
|
50,140
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
50,140
|
|
Unrealized
gain related to interest rate swaps, net of tax |
|
|
-
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
661
|
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
|
50,140
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
50,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
against Tax sharing receivable - Southern Union |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,920
|
|
|
13,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
852,546 |
|
$ |
1,892 |
|
$ |
(57,051 |
) |
$ |
797,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM
1. Financial Statements
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line),
including all of its subsidiaries (collectively, Panhandle) have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the
SEC) for
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. These statements do not include all of the
information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting
principles, and should be read in conjunction with Panhandle’s financial
statements and notes thereto for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004,
included in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line’s Form
10-K filed with the SEC. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
reflect adjustments (including both normal recurring as well as any
non-recurring) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair
statement of results for the interim period. Because of the seasonal nature of
Panhandle’s operations, the results of operations and cash flows for any interim
period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the full year. All dollar amounts in the tables herein are stated in thousands
unless otherwise indicated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified
to conform with the current period presentation.
I
Corporate Structure
Panhandle Eastern
Pipe Line is an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Union Company (Southern
Union Company and,
together with its subsidiaries, Southern
Union).
Panhandle is primarily engaged in the interstate transportation and storage of
natural gas and also provides liquefied natural gas (LNG)
terminalling and regasification services. Panhandle is subject to the rules and
regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the FERC). The
Panhandle entities include the following:
· |
Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line |
· |
Trunkline
Gas Company, LLC (Trunkline),
a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line |
· |
Sea
Robin Pipeline Company, LLC (Sea
Robin),
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line |
· |
Trunkline
LNG Company, LLC (Trunkline
LNG),
a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Trunkline LNG Holdings, LLC
(LNG
Holdings),
which is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line; and |
· |
Pan
Gas Storage, LLC (d.b.a. Southwest
Gas Storage),
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line.
|
Collectively,
Panhandle’s pipeline assets include more than 10,000 miles of interstate
pipelines that transport natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico, South Texas and
the panhandle regions of Texas and Oklahoma to major U.S. markets in the Midwest
and Great Lakes region. The pipelines have a combined peak day delivery capacity
of 5.4 billion cubic feet (bcf) per day
and 72 bcf of owned underground storage capacity. Trunkline LNG, located on
Louisiana's Gulf Coast, operates one of the largest LNG import terminals in
North America, based on current send out capacity, and has 6.3 bcf of above
ground LNG storage capacity.
Southern
Union Panhandle, LLC, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Union
Company, serves as the general partner of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and owns a
one percent general partner interest in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line. Southern
Union Company owns a ninety-nine percent limited partner interest in Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
II
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other
Matters
Principles
of Consolidation. The
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all
majority-owned subsidiaries of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line, after eliminating
significant intercompany transactions and balances. Investments in businesses
not controlled by Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line, but over which it may have
significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method. Investments
that are variable interest entities are consolidated if Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line is allocated a majority of the entity’s gains and/or losses, including fees
paid by the entity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Asset
Impairment.
Panhandle applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No.
144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” to
account for impairments on long-lived assets. Impairment losses are recognized
for long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are
present and the undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the
assets’ carrying value. The amount of impairment is measured by comparing the
fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.
Revenues.
Panhandle’s
revenues from transportation and storage of natural gas and LNG terminalling are
based on capacity reservation charges and commodity usage charges. Reservation
revenues are based on contracted rates and capacity reserved by the customers
and are recognized monthly. Revenues from commodity usage charges are also
recognized monthly, based on the volumes received from or delivered to the
customer, depending on the tariff of that particular Panhandle entity, with any
differences in received and delivered volumes resulting in an imbalance. Volume
imbalances are generally settled in-kind with no impact on revenues, with the
exception of Trunkline, which settles imbalances via cash pursuant to its
tariff, and records gains and losses on such cashout sales as a component of
revenue, to the extent not owed back to customers.
System
Gas and Operating Supplies. System
gas and operating supplies consist of gas held for operations and materials and
supplies, carried at the lower of weighted average cost or market. The gas held
for operations that is not expected to be consumed in operations in the next
twelve months has been reflected in non-current assets. All system gas and
materials and supplies purchased are recorded at the lower of cost or market,
while net gas received from and owed back to customers is valued at market.
Significant
Customers and Credit Risk.
Panhandle manages trade credit risks to minimize exposure to uncollectible trade
receivables. Prospective and existing customers are reviewed for
creditworthiness based upon pre-established standards. Customers that do not
meet minimum standards are required to provide additional credit support.
Panhandle utilizes the allowance method for recording its allowance for
uncollectible accounts which is primarily based on the application of historical
bad debt percentages applied against Panhandle’s aged accounts receivable.
Increases in the allowance are recorded as a component of operation expenses.
Reductions in the allowance are recorded when receivables are written off.
Panhandle had an allowance for doubtful accounts totaling $1,219,000 and
$1,289,000 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, relating to its
trade receivables.
Accounting
for Postretirement Benefits. To
account for postretirement benefit costs other than pensions, Panhandle follows
SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions”, and SFAS No. 132R, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits,” as amended. For defined benefit plans, under certain
circumstances, these statements require liabilities to be recorded on the
balance sheet at the present value of these future obligations to employees net
of any plan assets. The calculation of these liabilities and associated expenses
requires the expertise of actuaries and is subject to many assumptions,
including life expectancies, present value discount rates, expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets, rate of compensation increase and anticipated
health care costs. Any change in these assumptions can significantly change the
liability and associated expenses recognized in any given year.
Panhandle
does not maintain or participate in a defined benefit retirement plan for its
employees, but instead provides benefits to substantially all employees under a
defined contribution 401(k) plan. Under the 401(k) plan, Panhandle provides a
matching contribution of fifty percent of the employee’s contribution to the
401(k) plan that does not exceed four percent of the employee’s eligible pay.
Panhandle makes additional contributions to the 401(k) plan with the
amount generally varying based on age and years of service under a
Retirement Power Account benefit.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting
for Derivatives and Hedging Activities.
Panhandle follows SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities”,
as
amended, to accrue for derivative and hedging activities. See Note
V - Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities.
Accounting
for Taxes. For
federal and certain state income tax purposes, Panhandle’s subsidiaries are not
treated as separate taxpayers. Instead, their income is directly taxable to
Southern Union. Since its conversion to a limited partnership, Panhandle has
been treated as a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant
to a tax sharing agreement with Southern Union, Panhandle will pay its share of
taxes based on its taxable income, which will generally equal the liability that
Panhandle would have incurred as a separate taxpayer. Panhandle will receive
credit under an intercompany note from Southern Union for differences in tax
depreciation resulting from the like-kind exchange over the taxable life of the
related assets.
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax
rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Deferred tax assets, such as net operating loss carryforwards, may be reduced by
a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
Commitments
and Contingencies.
Panhandle is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to
environmental and other matters. Accounting for contingencies requires
significant judgments by management regarding the estimated probabilities and
ranges of exposure to potential liability. See Note
IX - Commitments and Contingencies.
New
Accounting Standards
FSP
No. FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003”
(the
Medicare Prescription Drug Act): Issued
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) in May
2004, FASB Financial Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS
106-2 (FSP
FAS 106-2)
requires entities to record the impact of the Medicare Drug Prescription Act as
an actuarial gain in the postretirement benefit obligation for postretirement
benefit plans that provide drug benefits covered by that legislation. Panhandle
adopted this FSP as of March 31, 2005, the effect of which was not material to
its consolidated financial statements. The effect of this FSP may vary as a
result of any future changes to Panhandle’s benefit plans.
FASB
Statement No.123R, “Share-Based Payment (revised 2004)”:
Issued by
the FASB in December 2004, the statement revises FASB Statement No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” supersedes the Accounting Principal
Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends
FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” This statement will be
effective for Southern Union, Panhandle’s parent company, beginning January 1,
2006, and will require Southern Union to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its
consolidated financial statements. Panhandle will be charged for its
proportionate share of the expense recorded by Southern Union. In addition, the
adoption of this statement will require additional accounting and disclosure
related to the income tax and cash flow effects resulting from share-based
payment arrangements. Panhandle is currently evaluating the impact of this
statement on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FSP
No. 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, ‘Accounting for Income
Taxes,’ to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”: On
October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was
signed. The Act raises a number of issues with respect to accounting for income
taxes. On December 21, 2004, the FASB issued a Staff Position regarding the
accounting implications of the Act related to the deduction for qualified
domestic production activities (FSP FAS 109-1), which is effective for
periods subsequent to December 31, 2004. The guidance in the FSP otherwise
applies to financial statements for periods ending after the date the Act was
enacted. In FSP FAS 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, ‘Accounting
for Income Taxes,’ to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities
Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” the FASB decided that the
deduction for qualified domestic production activities should be accounted for
as a special deduction under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and rejected an alternative view to treat it
as a rate reduction. Accordingly, any benefit from the deduction should be
reported in the period in which the deduction is claimed on the tax return. In
most cases, a company’s existing deferred tax balances will not be impacted at
the date of enactment. The deduction could have an impact on the effective tax
rate of some companies and, therefore, should be considered when determining the
estimated annual rate used for interim financial reporting. Panhandle has
evaluated the impact of this FSP and does not believe it will have
a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
FSP
No. FIN 46R-5, “Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities”: Issued
by the FASB in March 2005, this staff position addresses whether a reporting
enterprise should consider whether it holds an implicit variable interest in a
variable interest entity (VIE) or
potential VIE when specific conditions exist. An implicit variable interest is
an implied pecuniary interest in an entity that indirectly changes with changes
in the fair value of the entity’s net assets exclusive of variable interests.
Implicit variable interests may arise from transactions with related parties, as
well as from transactions with unrelated parties. This FSP will
be effective, for entities to which the interpretations of FIN 46(R) have
been applied, beginning December 31, 2005. Panhandle adopted this FSP as of
March 31, 2005, the effect of which had no impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FIN
No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations.” Issued
by the FASB in March 2005, this interpretation clarifies that the term
“conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in SFAS No. 143, “Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an
asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are
conditioned on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the
entity. Accordingly, the entity is required to recognize a liability for the
fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation, when incurred, if the
fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. This
interpretation will be effective beginning on December 31, 2005. Panhandle is
currently evaluating the impact of this interpretation on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FASB
Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of
APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” Issued by
the FASB in May 2005, this statement requires
retrospective application to prior period financial statements for changes in
accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This statement
also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle
be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in
accounting principle should be recognized in the period of the accounting
change. This statement further requires a change in depreciation, amortization
or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets to be accounted for as
a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle.
This statement will be effective for Panhandle beginning on January 1, 2006.
FERC
Accounting Release: On June
30, 2005, the FERC issued an order, subject to rehearing, on accounting for
pipeline assessment costs which requires pipeline companies to expense rather
than capitalize certain costs related to mandated pipeline integrity programs
(under the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002). The accounting release
determined that assessment activities associated with an integrity management
program must be accounted for as maintenance and charged to expense in the
period incurred. Costs associated with any remediation or rehabilitation can be
capitalized. The accounting guidance is now proposed to be effective January 1,
2006. Panhandle
is currently reviewing the implications of the FERC accounting order.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
III
Regulatory Matters
In
conjunction with a FERC Order issued in September 1997, certain natural gas
producers were required to refund to interstate natural gas pipelines, including
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line, monies previously paid to producers as
reimbursement of the producers Kansas Ad Valorem tax obligations. The FERC order
required the affected pipelines to refund these amounts to their customers.
Settlements were reached with all of the non-settling producers in November
2003, except for Pioneer Natural Resources, Inc. (Pioneer) and
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, LP (Burlington). On
January 29, 2004 and February 13, 2004, the FERC approved settlements with these
remaining non-settling producers. A FERC hearing to resolve the outstanding
issues with Pioneer was conducted on October 16, 2003. The FERC issued orders
that established Pioneer’s refund amount on June 2, 2004 and October 12, 2004.
As of December 31, 2004, all tax collections due from producers had been
received and distributed to Panhandle’s customers. However, one producer,
Burlington, is contesting the applicability of the FERC refund requirement due
to a prior gas purchase contract settlement with Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line. On
January 21, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit remanded this case back to the FERC for further explanation as
to why Burlington should be required to make a refund to Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line. On July 8, 2005, the FERC issued an order on remand reaffirming their
prior decision to require Burlington to pay its ad valorem refund obligation.
Management believes that this matter will not have a material adverse effect on
Panhandle’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. There were
no liabilities remaining on Panhandle’s balance sheet related to this matter at
June 30, 2005. At December 31, 2004, other current liabilities included $206,000
for tax collections due to customers.
In
December 2002, the FERC approved a Trunkline LNG certificate application to
expand the Lake Charles facility to approximately 1.2 bcf per day of sustainable
send out capacity versus the current sustainable send out capacity of .63 bcf
per day, and to increase terminal storage capacity to 9 bcf from the current 6.3
bcf. BG LNG Services has contract rights for the .57 bcf per day of additional
capacity. Construction on the Trunkline LNG expansion project (Phase
I)
commenced in September 2003 and is expected to be completed at an estimated cost
of $137 million, plus capitalized interest, by the end of 2005, with a portion
of the expansion facilities expected to be in service by the end of the third
quarter. On September 17, 2004, as modified on September 23, 2004, the FERC
approved Trunkline LNG’s further incremental expansion project (Phase
II). Phase
II is estimated to cost approximately $77 million, plus capitalized interest,
and would increase the LNG terminal sustainable send out capacity to 1.8 bcf per
day. Phase II has an expected in-service date of mid-2006. BG LNG Services has
contracted for all the proposed additional capacity, subject to Trunkline LNG
achieving certain construction milestones at this facility. Approximately $166
million and $127 million of costs are included in the line item Construction
work-in-progress for the expansion projects at June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively.
In
February 2004, Trunkline filed an application with the FERC to request approval
of a 30-inch diameter, 23-mile natural gas pipeline loop from the LNG terminal.
The FERC approved Trunkline’s filing on September 17, 2004, as modified on
September 23, 2004. The new pipeline will create additional transport capacity
in association with the Trunkline LNG expansion and also includes new and
expanded delivery points with major interstate pipelines. On November 5, 2004,
Trunkline filed an amended application with the FERC to change the size of the
pipeline from 30-inch diameter to 36-inch diameter to better position Trunkline
to provide transportation service for expected future LNG volumes and increase
operational flexibility. The amendment was approved by FERC on February 11,
2005. The Trunkline natural gas pipeline loop project associated with the LNG
terminal is estimated to cost $50 million, plus capitalized interest.
Approximately $34 million and $21 million of costs are included in the line item
Construction work-in-progress for this project at June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IV
Related Party Transactions
Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line receives transportation revenues from Missouri Gas Energy, a
Southern Union division, which account for less than one percent of annual
consolidated revenues. These deliveries are at contracted rates that pre-date
the acquisition
of Panhandle by Southern Union in June
2003 (the Panhandle
Acquisition).
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Related
Party Transactions |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
and storage of natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
960 |
|
$ |
956 |
|
$ |
1,855 |
|
$ |
1,932 |
|
Operation
and maintenance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
& royalty fees |
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
|
6,145
|
|
|
6,241
|
|
Other
expenses |
|
|
4,585
|
|
|
4,166
|
|
|
8,289
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
Other
income, net |
|
|
870
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
798
|
|
Pursuant
to a demand note with Southern Union under a cash management program, Panhandle
has loaned excess cash, net of repayments, totaling $135,055,000 to Southern
Union since the Panhandle Acquisition. Net loans of $41,310,000 and $44,310,000
were recorded during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005,
respectively. Panhandle is credited with interest on the note at a one month
LIBOR rate. Interest income associated with the Note receivable - Southern Union
was $814,000 and $1,324,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2005, respectively, and $430,000 and $698,000 for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and is included in Other, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. Panhandle expects to draw
down on a portion of the note receivable over the next twelve months to fund
capital expenditures in excess of operating cash flows and has thus reflected
that portion of the note receivable from Southern Union as a current asset.
A summary
of certain balances due from or (due to) related parties included in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the periods presented is as
follows:
|
|
June
30, |
|
December
31, |
|
Related
Party Transactions |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
receivable - Southern Union - current |
|
$ |
65,761 |
|
$ |
90,745 |
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
(12,290 |
) |
|
(3,478 |
) |
Note
receivable - Southern Union - non-current |
|
|
69,294
|
|
|
-
|
|
Owners'
equity - Tax sharing note receivable - Southern Union |
|
|
57,051
|
|
|
70,971
|
|
Southern
Union structured the Panhandle Acquisition in a manner intended to qualify as a
like-kind exchange of property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended. For tax purposes, the Panhandle assets that were part of
the exchange were recorded at the tax basis of the Southern Union assets for
which they were exchanged. The resulting transaction generated an estimated
deferred tax liability of approximately $91 million at the acquisition date and
a corresponding receivable from Southern Union reflected as a reduction to
owners’ equity on Panhandle’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Repayment of the
receivable from Southern Union is limited to actual tax liabilities otherwise
payable by Panhandle pursuant to the tax sharing agreement with Southern Union.
In the
first and second quarters of 2005, Panhandle recorded a $13,292,000 and $628,000
income tax liability settlement against the Tax sharing note receivable,
respectively. In the
fourth quarter of 2004, Panhandle recorded a $12,247,000 reduction in its
deferred tax liability and the corresponding Tax sharing note receivable from
Southern Union due to revised calculations in the amount of Panhandle’s tax
basis utilized by Southern Union in the like-kind exchange associated with the
Panhandle Acquisition.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
November 17, 2004, CCE Holdings, LLC (CCE), a joint venture in which
Southern Union owns a 50 percent interest, acquired 100 percent of the equity
interests of CrossCountry Energy, LLC (CrossCountry) from Enron Corp.
and certain of its subsidiaries for approximately $2,450,000,000 in cash,
including the assumption of certain consolidated debt. On November 5, 2004, CCE
entered into an Administrative Services Agreement (the Management
Agreement) with Panhandle and SU Pipeline Management LP (Manager),
a Delaware limited partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Union.
Under the terms of the Management Agreement, Panhandle covenants, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, to cause Manager to perform the duties and
obligations of Manager. Manager has assembled an integrated pipeline management
team, which includes employees of Panhandle and CrossCountry. Pursuant to the
Management Agreement, Manager is responsible for the operations and
administrative functions of the enterprise. CCE and Manager will share certain
operations of Manager and its affiliates, and CCE will be obligated to bear its
share of costs of the Manager and its affiliates, as well as certain transition
costs and, under certain conditions, pay annual management fees to Manager.
Transition costs are non-recurring costs of establishing the shared services,
including but not limited to severance costs, professional fees, certain
transaction costs, and the costs of relocating offices and personnel, pursuant
to the Management Agreement. At December 31, 2004, Panhandle recognized a
liability of approximately $6 million for severance related costs that are
reimbursable from CCE for which an offsetting amount was recorded in Accounts
receivable - related parties. At June 30, 2005, Accounts receivable - related
parties includes $4,167,000 and Other current liabilities includes $5,389,000
for severance related costs.
V
Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Panhandle
follows SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities”,
as
amended, to account for derivative and hedging activities. Panhandle utilizes
interest-rate related derivative instruments to manage its exposure on its debt
instruments and does not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other
than hedging purposes. All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at
their fair value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, Panhandle
designates the derivative as either: (i) a hedge of the fair value of a
recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment
(fair
value hedge) or (ii)
a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be
received or paid in conjunction with a recognized asset or liability
(cash
flow hedge).
Interest
rate swaps are used to reduce interest rate risks and to manage interest
expense. By entering into these agreements, Panhandle converts floating-rate
debt into fixed-rate debt or converts fixed-rate debt to floating. Interest
differentials paid or received under the swap agreements are reflected as an
adjustment to interest expense. These interest rate swaps are financial
derivative instruments that qualify for hedge treatment. For derivatives treated
as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value
is recorded in other comprehensive income until the related hedge items impact
earnings. Any ineffective portion of a hedge is reported in earnings
immediately. Upon termination of a cash flow hedge of the variability of cash
flows to be paid, the resulting gain or loss is amortized to income through the
maturity date of the original designated hedging relationship, unless it is
probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur during a specified time
period. For derivatives treated as a hedge of the fair value of a debt
instrument, the effective portion of changes in fair value are recorded as an
adjustment to the hedged debt. The ineffective portion of a fair value hedge is
recognized in earnings if the short cut method of assessing effectiveness is not
used. Upon termination of a fair value hedge of a debt instrument, the resulting
gain or loss is amortized to income through the maturity date of the debt
instrument.
On April
29, 2005, existing LNG Holdings' bank loans due in January 2007 were repaid in
full using the proceeds from a Credit Agreement entered into on April 26, 2005
(the
Credit Agreement).
Interest rate swaps previously designated as cash flow hedges of the LNG
Holdings' bank loans were terminated upon repayment of the loans on April 29,
2005 (see Note
VI - Debt). As a
result, a gain of $3,465,000 ($2,072,000, net of tax), was recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is
being amortized to interest expense through the maturity date of the original
bank loans in 2007, of which $3,153,000 ($1,885,000, net of tax) remains at June
30, 2005.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Prior to
the termination of the original loans due January 2007, Panhandle’s
subsidiary LNG Holdings was party to interest rate swap agreements that fixed
the interest rate applicable to floating rate long-term debt and that qualified
for hedge accounting. From January 1, 2005 through the termination date, the
amount of swap ineffectiveness was not material. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2004, the amount of swap ineffectiveness was not material. For the
period January 1, 2005 through the termination date, an unrealized gain of
$1,408,000 ($842,000, net of tax) was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income related to these swaps. For the period from the termination
date through June 30, 2005, a gain of $313,000 ($187,000, net of tax) was
amortized to interest expense. For the six month period ended June 30, 2004, an
unrealized gain of $679,000 ($405,000, net of tax) was included in accumulated
other comprehensive income related to these swaps. Current market pricing models
were used to estimate fair values of interest rate swap agreements.
In March
2004, Panhandle entered into interest rate swaps to hedge the risk associated
with the fair value of its $200 million 2.75 percent Senior Notes. See
Note
VI - Debt. These
swaps are designated as fair value hedges and qualify for the short cut method
under SFAS No. 133. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 the fair value
position of the swaps was a liability of $5,468,000 and $3,936,000,
respectively, recorded as a reduction to long-term debt. Under the swap
agreements, Panhandle will receive fixed interest payments at a rate of 2.75
percent per annum and will make floating interest payments based on the
six-month LIBOR. No ineffectiveness is assumed in the hedging relationship
between the debt instrument and the interest rate swaps. As of June 30, 2005,
these swaps have an average interest rate of 3.72 percent.
VI
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
Debt |
|
Year
Due |
|
June
30, 2005 |
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50%
Senior Notes |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
60,623 |
|
$ |
60,623 |
|
8.25%
Senior Notes |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
7.00%
Senior Notes |
|
|
2029 |
|
|
66,305
|
|
|
66,305
|
|
4.80%
Senior Notes |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
6.05%
Senior Notes |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
2.75%
Senior Notes |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Bank
loans (floating rate) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
255,626
|
|
|
258,433
|
|
Total
debt outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
1,173,054
|
|
|
1,175,861
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12,548 |
) |
Interest
rate swaps (2.75% Senior Notes) |
|
|
|
|
|
(5,468 |
) |
|
(3,936 |
) |
Unamortized
debt premium, net |
|
|
|
|
|
13,459
|
|
|
14,688
|
|
Total
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,181,045 |
|
$ |
1,174,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panhandle
has $1,181,045,000 of debt recorded at June 30, 2005. Debt of $925,419,000,
including net premiums of $13,459,000 and interest rate swaps of $5,468,000, is
at annual fixed rates ranging from 2.75 percent to 8.25 percent, with an average
annual interest rate of 5.12 percent excluding debt premium, discount and
issuance cost amortization. The $255,626,000 of variable rate bank loans, which
were refinanced during the second quarter of 2005, had an average rate of 3.87
percent and 4.01 percent per annum for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2005, respectively.
Panhandle’s
notes are subject to certain requirements such as the maintenance of a fixed
charge coverage ratio and a leverage ratio which restrict certain payments if
not maintained, and limitations on liens. At June 30, 2005, Panhandle, based on
the currently most restrictive debt covenant requirements, was subject to a
$384,442,000 limitation on additional restricted payments including dividends
and loans to affiliates, and a limitation of $224,748,000 of additional secured
or subsidiary level indebtedness or other defined liens based on a limitation on
liens covenant. Panhandle is also subject to a limitation of $294,349,000 of
total additional indebtedness. At June 30, 2005, Panhandle was in compliance
with all covenants.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At June
30, 2005, Panhandle had no scheduled debt payments for the remainder of 2005 and
2006 and scheduled payments of $455,626,000, $300,000,000, $60,623,000 and
$356,805,000 for the years 2007 through 2009 and in total thereafter,
respectively.
LNG
Holdings, as borrower, and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline LNG, as
guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement dated as of April 26, 2005, with a
consortium of banks for a senior term loan financing in the aggregate principal
amount of $255,626,000 which matures on March 15, 2007. The senior term loan
carries a floating interest rate tied to LIBOR or prime interest rates at
Panhandle’s option, in addition to a margin which is tied to the rating of
Panhandle’s unsecured senior funded debt. On April 29, 2005, the proceeds from
the Credit Agreement were used to repay all outstanding indebtedness under
existing LNG Holdings floating rate bank loans that were due in 2007.
On March
12, 2004, Panhandle issued $200,000,000 of 2.75 percent Senior Notes due 2007,
Series A, in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 for offers and sales of securities not involving a public
offering or sale, in order to refinance Panhandle’s maturing debt. Panhandle
used a portion of the net proceeds to retire $146,080,000 of 6.125 percent
Senior Notes which matured on March 15, 2004, as well as for other general
corporate purposes. A portion of the remaining net proceeds was also used to pay
off the $52,455,000 of 7.875 percent Senior Notes which matured on August 15,
2004. Panhandle filed a registration statement on May 12, 2004 to initiate an
exchange of the unregistered 2.75 percent Senior Notes due 2007, Series A, for
substantially identical securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Such exchange was completed on June 25, 2004.
VII
Comprehensive Income
The table
below provides an overview of comprehensive income for the periods
indicated.
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
$ |
18,670 |
|
$ |
14,144 |
|
$ |
50,140 |
|
$ |
47,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain (loss) related to interest rate swaps, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
of taxes of $200, $2,555, $1,612, and $1,962, respectively |
|
|
311
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
Realized
(gains) losses in net income, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
of taxes of $(384), $(768), $1,170, and $(1,688),
respectively |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
(2,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income |
|
$ |
18,401 |
|
$ |
16,801 |
|
$ |
50,801 |
|
$ |
47,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 includes unrealized gains related to interest
rate swaps.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
VIII
Benefits
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Net
periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
for postretirement benefit plans other than pensions (OPEB) includes the
following components:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
OPEB |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost |
|
$ |
619 |
|
$ |
509 |
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
Interest
cost |
|
|
823
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
Expected
return on plan assets |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
(104 |
) |
|
(464 |
) |
|
(152 |
) |
Amortization
of prior service cost |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
-
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
-
|
|
Amortization
of transition obligation |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Recognized
actuarial gain |
|
|
17
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
-
|
|
Settlement
recognition |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
$ |
1,124 |
|
$ |
2,731 |
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, approximately $3.5 million and
$3.9 million in contributions have been made to the OPEB plan, respectively.
Panhandle expects to contribute an additional $3.9 million to fund the OPEB plan
in 2005 for a total of $7.8 million. The accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation with respect to OPEB as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was
approximately $37,086,000 and $38,260,000, respectively, including current
portion.
Panhandle
does not have a pension plan but does make employer contributions to a qualified
defined contribution plan, with the
amount generally varying based on age and years of service. During
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, approximately $1 million
and $2 million, respectively, was recorded as expense associated with Panhandle
contributions to the qualified defined contribution plan. During the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2004, approximately $1 million and $2 million,
respectively, was recorded as expense associated with Panhandle contributions to
the qualified defined contribution plan.
Stock
Based Compensation. Following
its acquisition by Southern Union on June 11, 2003 and in accordance with
Southern Union’s policy, Panhandle reports stock option grants using the
intrinsic-value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees,” and related authoritative interpretations. Under the
intrinsic-value method, no compensation expense is recognized because the
exercise price of the Southern Union employee stock options is greater than or
equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of
grant.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
following table illustrates the effect on net earnings if Panhandle had applied
the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by FASB Statement No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure,” to
stock-based employee compensation:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings, as reported |
|
$ |
18,670 |
|
$ |
14,144 |
|
$ |
50,140 |
|
$ |
47,201 |
|
Deduct
total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense
determined under fair value based method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
all awards, net of related taxes |
|
|
51
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
79
|
|
Pro
forma net earnings |
|
|
18,619
|
|
|
14,084
|
|
|
50,038
|
|
|
47,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently
Enacted Legislation. The
Medicare Prescription Drug Act was signed into law December 8, 2003. The Act
introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare
Part D) as well
as a federal subsidy, which is not taxable, to sponsors of retiree
healthcare benefit plans that provide a prescription drug benefit that is at
least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. Issued by the FASB in May 2004,
FASB Financial Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS
106-2 requires entities to record the impact of the Medicare Prescription Drug
Act as an actuarial gain in the postretirement benefit obligation for
postretirement benefit plans that provide drug benefits covered by that
legislation. Panhandle adopted this FSP as of March 31, 2005, the effect of
which was not material to its consolidated financial statements. The effect of
this FSP may vary as a result of any future changes to Panhandle's benefit
plans.
IX
Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation. Panhandle
is involved in legal, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts,
regulatory bodies and governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the
ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial amounts. Where
appropriate, Panhandle has made accruals in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
“Accounting for Contingencies,” in order to provide for such matters. Management
believes the final disposition of any such proceedings will not have a material
adverse effect on Panhandle’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or
financial position.
Hope Land
Mineral Corporation (Hope
Land)
contends that it owns the storage rights to property that contains a portion of
Panhandle’s Howell storage field. During June 2003, the Michigan Court of
Appeals reversed the trial court’s previous order, which had granted summary
judgment in favor of Panhandle and dismissed the case. Panhandle filed an appeal
of the Court of Appeals order with the Michigan Supreme Court which was denied
in December of 2003. In April 2005, Hope Land filed trespass and unjust
enrichment complaints against Panhandle to prevent running of the statute of
limitations. Panhandle filed an action for condemnation to obtain the storage
rights from Hope Land. The trial court has not yet issued a scheduling order,
but the trial is expected to be scheduled for the second quarter of 2006.
Panhandle does not believe the outcome of this case will have a material adverse
effect on Panhandle’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or
financial position.
Jack
Grynberg, an individual, has filed actions against a number of companies,
including Panhandle, now transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District
of Wyoming, for damages for mis-measurement of gas volumes and Btu content,
resulting in lower royalties to mineral interest owners. On May 13, 2005, the
Special Master in this case issued a recommended decision that would, if adopted
by the District Judge, result in dismissal of Panhandle and its affiliates from
the case. A similar action, known as the Will Price litigation, has also been
filed against a number of companies, including Panhandle, in Kansas District
Court. Panhandle is currently awaiting the decision of the trial judge on the
defendants’ motion to dismiss the Will Price action. Panhandle believes that its
measurement practices conformed to the terms of its FERC Gas Tariff, which was
filed with and approved by FERC. As a result, Panhandle believes that it has
meritorious defenses to the complaints (including FERC-related affirmative
defenses, such as the filed rate/tariff doctrine, the primary/exclusive
jurisdiction of FERC, and the defense that Panhandle complied with the terms of
its tariff) and is defending the suits vigorously.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Environmental
Matters. Panhandle’s
gas transmission operations are subject to federal, state and local regulations
regarding water quality, hazardous and solid waste management, air quality
control and other environmental matters. Panhandle has previously identified
environmental contamination at certain sites on its gas transmission systems and
has undertaken cleanup programs at these sites. The contamination resulted from
the past use of lubricants containing polychlorinated bi-phenyls (PCBs) in
compressed air systems; the past use of paints containing PCBs; and the prior
use of wastewater collection facilities and other on-site disposal areas.
Panhandle has developed and is implementing a program to remediate such
contamination in accordance with federal, state and local regulations.
As part
of the cleanup program resulting from contamination due to the use of lubricants
containing PCBs in compressed air systems, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and
Trunkline have identified PCB levels above acceptable levels inside the
auxiliary buildings that house the air compressor equipment at thirty-three
compressor station sites. Panhandle has developed and is implementing a United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
approved process to remediate this PCB contamination in accordance with federal,
state and local regulations. Sixteen sites have been decontaminated per the EPA
approved process as prescribed in the EPA regulations.
At some
locations, PCBs have been identified in paint that was applied many years ago.
In accordance with EPA regulations, Panhandle has implemented a program to
remediate sites where such issues are identified during painting activities. If
PCBs are identified above acceptable levels, the paint is removed and disposed
of in an EPA approved manner.
The
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois
EPA)
notified Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline, together with other
non-affiliated parties, of contamination at three former waste oil disposal
sites in Illinois. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line’s and Trunkline’s estimated share
for the costs of assessment and remediation of the sites, based on the volume of
waste sent to the facilities, is approximately seventeen percent. Panhandle and
twenty-one other non-affiliated parties conducted an initial voluntary
investigation of the Pierce Oil Springfield site, one of the three sites. In
addition, Illinois EPA has informally indicated that it has referred the Pierce
Oil Springfield site to the EPA so that environmental contamination present at
the site can be addressed through the federal Superfund program. No formal
notice has yet been received from either agency concerning the referral.
However, the EPA is expected to issue special notice letters and has begun the
process of listing the site on the National Priority List. Panhandle and three
of the other non-affiliated parties associated with the Pierce Oil Springfield
site met with the EPA and Illinois EPA regarding this issue. Panhandle was given
no indication as to when the listing process was to be completed. Panhandle has
also submitted a Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 104e
data request from the EPA Region V regarding the second Pierce Waste Oil site
known as the Dunavan site, located in Oakwood, Illinois. Panhandle’s response
showed that waste oil generated at Panhandle facilities was shipped to the
Dunavan Oil site in Oakwood, Illinois, resulting in Panhandle becoming a
potentially responsible party at such site.
Panhandle
expects the cleanup programs for all of the above matters to continue for
several years and has estimated its share of remaining cleanup costs to range
from approximately $6.4 million to $15 million. At June 30, 2005, Panhandle has
related accruals totaling approximately $12,236,000, of which $2,602,000 is
included in Other current liabilities for the estimated current amounts and
$9,634,000 is included in Other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. At December 31, 2004, Panhandle had related accruals totaling
approximately $12,912,000, of which $3,046,000 is included in Other current
liabilities for the estimated current amounts and $9,866,000 is included in
Other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the six
month period ended June 30, 2005, Panhandle spent $675,000 related to these
cleanup programs.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On June
16, 2005, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line experienced a release of liquid
hydrocarbons near Pleasant Hill, Illinois. The release occurred in the form of a
mist at a valve that was in use to reduce the pressure in the pipeline as part
of maintenance activities. The hydrocarbon mist affected several acres of
adjacent agricultural land and a nearby marina. Approximately forty-five gallons
of hydrocarbons reached the Mississippi River. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
contacted appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies and the EPA took the
lead role in overseeing the subsequent cleanup activities, which have been
completed. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line is in the process of resolving potential
claims of affected boat owners and the marina operator. No notices of violation
have been issued by the regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over this matter.
Panhandle does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material
adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Air
Quality Control. In 1998,
the EPA issued a final rule on regional ozone control that requires Panhandle to
place controls on engines in five midwestern states. The part of the rule that
affects Panhandle was challenged in court by various states, industry and other
interests, including the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
(INGAA), an
industry group to which Panhandle belongs. In March 2000, the court upheld most
aspects of the EPA’s rule, but agreed with INGAA’s position and remanded to the
EPA the sections of the rule that affected Panhandle. The final rule was
promulgated by the EPA in April 2004. The five midwestern states have not
promulgated state regulations to address the requirements of this rule. Based on
an EPA guidance document negotiated with gas industry representatives in 2002,
it is believed that Panhandle will be required under state rules to reduce
nitrogen oxide (NOx)
emissions by eighty-two percent on the identified large internal combustion
engines and will be able to trade off engines within the company and within each
of the five Midwestern states affected by the rule in an effort to create a cost
effective NOx reduction solution. The final implementation date is May 2007. The
rule impacts twenty large internal combustion engines on the Panhandle system in
Illinois and Indiana at an approximate cost of $23 million for capital
improvements through 2007, based on current projections.
On July
26, 2005 the Illinois EPA distributed a draft of a rule to control NOx emissions
from reciprocating engines and turbines state-wide by May 1, 2007. The state is
requiring the controls to comply with EPA rules regarding the NOx SIP Call,
ozone non-attainment and fine particulate standards. The agency is holding a
meeting on August 23, 2005 to discuss the draft rule and is expected to propose
the rule this fall. The rule is currently being reviewed for potential impact to
Panhandle. As drafted, the rule applies to all Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line and Trunkline stations in Illinois and significant expenditures would be
required for emission controls.
In 2002,
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality enacted the Houston/Galveston SIP
regulations requiring reductions in NOx emissions in an eight-county area
surrounding Houston. Trunkline’s Cypress compressor station is affected and
requires the installation of emission controls. New regulations also require
certain grandfathered facilities in Texas to enter into the new source permit
program which may require the installation of emission controls at one
additional facility owned and operated by Panhandle. These two rules affect two
company facilities in Texas at an estimated cost of approximately $14 million
for capital improvements through March 2007, based on current projections.
The EPA
promulgated various Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rules
in February 2004. The rules require that Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and
Trunkline control Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) emitted
from certain internal combustion engines at major HAPs sources. Most of
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline compressor stations are major HAPs
sources. The HAPs pollutant of concern for Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and
Trunkline is formaldehyde. As promulgated, the rule seeks to reduce formaldehyde
emissions by seventy-six percent from these engines. Catalytic controls will be
required to reduce emissions under these rules with a final implementation date
of June 2007. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline have over twenty
internal combustion engines subject to the rules. It is expected that compliance
with these regulations will cost an estimated $1 million for capital
improvements, based on current projections.
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Other
Commitments and Contingencies. In 1993,
the U.S. Department of the Interior announced its intention to seek, through its
Mineral Management Service (MMS), additional royalties from gas
producers as a result of payments received by such producers in connection with
past take-or-pay settlements and buyouts and buydowns of gas sales contracts
with natural gas pipelines. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline, with
respect to certain producer contract settlements, may be contractually required
to reimburse or, in some instances, to indemnify producers against such royalty
claims. The potential liability of the producers to the government and of the
pipelines to the producers involves complex issues of law and fact, which are
likely to take substantial time to resolve. If required to reimburse or
indemnify the producers, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline may file with
the FERC to recover these costs from pipeline customers. Management believes
these commitments and contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on
Panhandle’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
In
conjunction with Southern Union’s investment in CCE and CCE’s acquisition of
CrossCountry from Enron Corp. and certain subsidiaries of Enron, Panhandle, in
the fourth quarter of 2004, initiated a workforce reduction plan designed to
reduce the workforce by approximately six percent. Approximately $6 million of
the approximately $7.7 million of the resulting severance and related costs are
reimbursable by CCE pursuant to agreements between the parties involved. As of
June 30, 2005, approximately $2.3 million of these costs have been incurred and
$1.8 million have been reimbursed by CCE.
On
September 10, 2003, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line provided a guarantee to CB&I
Constructors, Inc. for the full performance by Trunkline LNG, its subsidiary, of
the engineering, procurement and construction contract between Trunkline LNG and
CB&I Constructors, Inc. The contract is for the construction of the
expansion of the Trunkline LNG Lake Charles facility, and covers approximately
$9 million of the remaining cost of the Phase I expansion through December 2005
and approximately $14 million of the remaining cost of the Phase II expansion
through June 2006. Under the terms of the guarantee, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
would be required to perform should Trunkline LNG be in default of its
obligation, as it relates to services already rendered. There are no amounts
being carried as liabilities for Panhandle’s obligations under these guarantees.
Controlled
Group Pension Liabilities. Southern
Union (including certain of its divisions) sponsors a number of defined benefit
pension plans for employees. Under applicable pension and tax laws, upon being
acquired by Southern Union, Panhandle became a member of Southern Union’s
“controlled group” with respect to those plans, and, along with Southern Union
and any other members of that group, is jointly and severally liable for any
failure by Southern Union (along with any other persons that may be or become a
sponsor of any such plan) to fund any of these pension plans or to pay any
unfunded liabilities that these plans may have if they are ever terminated. In
addition, if any of the obligations of any of these pension plans is not paid
when due, a lien in favor of that plan or the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation may be created against the assets of each member of Southern Union’s
controlled group, including Panhandle and each of its subsidiaries. Based on the
latest actuarial information available as of December 31, 2004, the aggregate
amount of the projected benefit obligations of these pension plans was
approximately $398,516,000 and the estimated fair value of all of the assets of
these plans was approximately $276,836,000.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition is
provided as a supplement to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements and notes to help provide an understanding of Panhandle’s
financial condition, results of operations and changes in financial condition.
The following section includes an overview of Panhandle’s business as well as
recent developments that Panhandle believes are important in understanding its
results of operations and in anticipating future trends in those operations.
Subsequent sections include an analysis of Panhandle’s results of operations on
a consolidated basis and information relating to Panhandle’s liquidity and
capital resources, quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk,
an outlook perspective for Panhandle, and other matters. The information
required by this Item is presented in a reduced disclosure format pursuant to
General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.
Overview
Panhandle
is primarily engaged in the interstate transportation and storage of natural gas
and also provides LNG terminalling and regasification services. The Panhandle
entities include Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line, Trunkline, Sea Robin, Trunkline
LNG and Southwest Gas Storage. Collectively, the pipeline assets include more
than 10,000 miles of interstate pipelines that transport natural gas from the
Gulf of Mexico, South Texas and the panhandle regions of Texas and Oklahoma to
major U.S. markets in the Midwest and Great Lakes region. The pipelines have a
combined peak day delivery capacity of 5.4 bcf per day, 72 bcf of owned
underground storage capacity and 6.3 bcf of above ground LNG storage capacity.
Trunkline LNG, located on Louisiana’s Gulf Coast, operates one of the largest
LNG import terminals in North America.
A
majority of Panhandle’s total operating revenue comes from long-term service
agreements with local distribution company customers and their affiliates.
Panhandle also provides firm transportation services under contract to gas
marketers, producers, other pipelines, electric power generators and a variety
of end-users. In addition, Panhandle’s pipelines offer both firm and
interruptible transportation to customers on a short-term or seasonal basis.
Demand for gas transmission on Panhandle’s pipeline systems is seasonal, with
the highest throughput and a higher portion of annual total operating revenues
and net earnings occurring in the traditional winter heating season in the first
and fourth calendar quarters. For the years 2000 to 2004, Panhandle’s combined
throughput was 1,374 trillion British thermal units (TBtu), 1,335
TBtu, 1,259 TBtu, 1,380 TBtu and 1,284 TBtu, respectively. For the six month
periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, Panhandle’s combined throughput
was 645 TBtu and 655 TBtu, respectively. Beginning in March 2000, the combined
throughput includes Sea Robin’s throughput.
Results
of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reservation
revenue - transportation & storage |
|
$ |
81,197 |
|
$ |
77,863 |
|
$ |
3,334 |
|
LNG
terminalling revenue |
|
|
13,561
|
|
|
14,081
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
Commodity
revenue - transportation & storage |
|
|
13,545
|
|
|
14,041
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
Other
revenue |
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Total
operating revenue |
|
|
110,421
|
|
|
108,251
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation,
maintenance and general |
|
|
48,132
|
|
|
52,584
|
|
|
(4,452 |
) |
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
15,025
|
|
|
14,876
|
|
|
149
|
|
Taxes,
other than on income and revenues |
|
|
6,869
|
|
|
6,674
|
|
|
195
|
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
70,026
|
|
|
74,134
|
|
|
(4,108 |
) |
Operating
income |
|
|
40,395
|
|
|
34,117
|
|
|
6,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
(11,499 |
) |
|
(12,024 |
) |
|
525
|
|
Other,
net |
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
Total
other expense, net |
|
|
(9,650 |
) |
|
(11,398 |
) |
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
before income taxes |
|
|
30,745
|
|
|
22,719
|
|
|
8,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes |
|
|
12,075
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
$ |
18,670 |
|
$ |
14,144 |
|
$ |
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Revenue. For the
three months ended June 30, 2005, operating revenue increased $2,170,000 versus
the same time period during 2004. The increase was a result of higher
reservation revenue of $3,334,000 due to higher average rates, partially offset
by lower LNG terminalling revenue of $520,000 due to reduced LNG volumes
received and lower commodity revenue of $496,000 primarily due to a reduction in
commodity volumes of two percent. Reservation average rates are dependent on
certain factors including customer demand for reserved capacity, capacity sold
levels for a given period, and, in some cases, utilization of capacity.
Commodity revenues are dependent upon a number of variable factors, including
weather, storage levels, and customer demand for firm, interruptible and parking
services.
Operating
Expenses.
Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 decreased $4,108,000
versus 2004, primarily due to a decrease in operation, maintenance and general
expenses of $4,452,000. Such decrease was primarily due to lower operational
expenses of approximately $5,300,000 primarily due to the timing of maintenance
activities performed during off-peak times, more of which was performed earlier
in the summer months of 2004, reduced administrative expenses of $1,600,000
primarily associated with the workforce reduction in 2004 and increased
synergies due to the integration of CrossCountry Energy (CrossCountry) and
reduced power costs of $538,000 due to reduced LNG volumes received, partially
offset by an increase in corporate charges of $1,359,000 and the higher net
recovery of previously underrecovered fuel volumes of $1,313,000.
Interest
Expense, Net. Interest
expense, net, for the three months ended June 30, 2005, versus the same time
period during 2004, was reduced by $525,000 primarily due to an increase in
capitalized interest due to the LNG expansion and the refinancing of the debt
that matured in March and August of 2004, partially offset by an increase in the
variable interest rate of the LNG Holdings bank loans. For further discussion of
Panhandle’s long-term debt, see Note
VI - Debt.
Other,
Net. Other,
net, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1,223,000 versus the
same time period during 2004, primarily due to higher related party interest
income caused by increases in the underlying LIBOR-based rates in 2005. For
further discussion of Panhandle’s related party interest income, see
Note
IV - Related Party Transactions.
Income
Taxes. Income
taxes during the three months ended June 30, 2005, versus the same time period
during 2004, increased $3,500,000 due to higher pretax income.
|
|
Six
Months |
|
Six
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reservation
revenue - transportation & storage |
|
$ |
181,784 |
|
$ |
179,075 |
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
LNG
terminalling revenue |
|
|
26,769
|
|
|
27,843
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
Commodity
revenue - transportation & storage |
|
|
32,978
|
|
|
34,689
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
Other
revenue |
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
(523 |
) |
Total
operating revenue |
|
|
245,821
|
|
|
246,420
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation,
maintenance and general |
|
|
98,315
|
|
|
102,309
|
|
|
(3,994 |
) |
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
30,392
|
|
|
30,023
|
|
|
369
|
|
Taxes,
other than on income and revenues |
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
142,912
|
|
|
146,532
|
|
|
(3,620 |
) |
Operating
income |
|
|
102,909
|
|
|
99,888
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net |
|
|
(23,347 |
) |
|
(24,179 |
) |
|
832
|
|
Other,
net |
|
|
2,746
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
Total
other expense, net |
|
|
(20,601 |
) |
|
(22,839 |
) |
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
before income taxes |
|
|
82,308
|
|
|
77,049
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes |
|
|
32,168
|
|
|
29,848
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings |
|
$ |
50,140 |
|
$ |
47,201 |
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Revenue. For the
six months ended June 30, 2005, operating revenue decreased $599,000 versus the
same time period during 2004. The decrease was a result of lower commodity
revenue of $1,711,000 primarily due to a reduction in commodity volumes of one
percent and lower LNG terminalling revenue of $1,074,000 due to a reduction
in LNG volumes received. Commodity revenues are dependent upon a number of
variable factors, including weather, storage levels, and customer demand for
firm, interruptible and parking services. This decrease was partially offset by
an increase in reservation revenue of $2,709,000 due to higher average rates.
Reservation average rates are dependent on certain factors including customer
demand for reserved capacity, capacity sold levels for a given period, and, in
some cases, utilization of capacity.
Operating
Expenses.
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased $3,620,000
versus 2004, primarily due to a decrease in operation, maintenance and general
expenses of $3,994,000. Such decrease was due to a reduction in operational
expenses of approximately $5,800,000 primarily due to the timing of maintenance
activities performed during off-peak times, more of which was performed earlier
in the summer months in 2004, reduced administrative costs of $2,200,000
primarily associated with the workforce reduction which was undertaken in 2004
due to the integration of CrossCountry and lower power costs of $737,000 due to
a reduction in LNG volumes received. Such decrease was partially offset by the
higher net recovery of previously underrecovered fuel volumes of $2,416,000 and
increased corporate charges of $1,155,000.
Interest
Expense, Net. Interest
expense, net, for the six months ended June 30, 2005, versus the same time
period during 2004, was reduced by $832,000 primarily due to an increase in
capitalized interest due to the LNG expansion and the refinancing of the debt
that matured in March and August of 2004, partially offset by an increase in the
interest rates of the variable interest rate debt and swaps. For further
discussion of Panhandle’s long-term debt, see Note
VI - Debt.
Other,
Net. Other,
net, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1,406,000 versus the same
time period during 2004, primarily due to higher related party interest income
caused by increases in the underlying LIBOR-based rates in 2005. For further
discussion of Panhandle’s related party interest income, see Note
IV - Related Party Transactions.
Income
Taxes. Income
taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2005, versus the same time period
during 2004, increased $2,320,000 due to higher pretax income.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Based on
Panhandle’s current level of operations, management believes that cash flow from
operations, available existing cash, and other sources, including liquid working
capital and new borrowings, will be adequate to meet liquidity needs for the
next several years, although no assurances can be given as to the sufficiency of
cash flows or the ability to refinance existing obligations.
Operating
Activities. Cash
flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June
30, 2004 were $130 million and $113 million, respectively. Changes in operating
assets and liabilities provided cash of $32 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 and $15 million for the same time period during 2004. The increase
in cash flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005
versus the same time period during 2004 was primarily attributable to the timing
of payments and cash receipts related to Panhandle’s working capital
accounts.
Investing
Activities.
Historically, Panhandle’s capital requirements have generally been satisfied
through operating cash flow, except that Panhandle may utilize access to capital
markets for extraordinary capital expenditures. Panhandle estimates remaining
expenditures associated with Phase I and Phase II LNG terminal expansion and the
Trunkline 36-inch diameter, 23-mile natural gas pipeline loop from the LNG
terminal to be approximately $54 million for the remainder of 2005 and
approximately $10 million in 2006. These estimates were developed for budget
planning purposes and are subject to revision.
Cash
flows used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005
decreased by approximately $21 million versus the same time period in 2004
primarily due to a decrease in net loans made to Southern Union of approximately
$54 million, partially offset by an increase in capital expenditures associated
with the LNG expansion projects of $33 million.
Financing
Activities. As of
June 30, 2005, Panhandle’s debt is rated BBB by Fitch Ratings, Inc. and Standard
& Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s. Panhandle’s note provisions are subject to the
maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio and a leverage ratio which restrict
certain payments if not maintained, and limitations on liens. At June 30, 2005,
Panhandle was subject to a $384,442,000 limitation on additional restricted
payments, including dividends and loans to affiliates, based on the current most
restrictive covenant, and a limitation of $224,748,000 of additional secured and
subsidiary level indebtedness based on a limitation on liens covenant. Panhandle
is also subject to a limitation of $294,349,000 of total additional
indebtedness. If Panhandle’s debt ratings were to fall below Baa3 by Moody’s and
below BBB- by Standard and Poor’s, then the allowable restricted payments would
be reduced to $334,368,000. At June 30, 2005, Panhandle was in compliance with
all covenants.
At June
30, 2005, Panhandle had no scheduled debt principal payments for the remainder
of 2005 and 2006 and scheduled payments of $455,626,000, $300,000,000,
$60,623,000 and $356,805,000 for the years 2007 through 2009 and in total
thereafter, respectively.
LNG
Holdings, as borrower, and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline LNG, as
guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement dated as of April 26, 2005, with a
consortium of banks for a senior term loan financing in the aggregate principal
amount of $255,626,000 that matures on March 15, 2007. The senior term loan
carries a floating interest rate tied to LIBOR or prime interest rates at
Panhandle’s option, in addition to a margin which is tied to the rating of
Panhandle’s unsecured senior funded debt. On April 29, 2005, the proceeds from
the Credit Agreement were used to repay all outstanding indebtedness under
existing LNG Holdings floating rate bank loans that were due in 2007.
On March
12, 2004, Panhandle issued $200,000,000 of 2.75 percent Senior Notes due 2007,
Series A, in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 for offers and sales of securities not involving a public
offering or sale, in order to refinance Panhandle’s maturing debt. Panhandle
used a portion of the net proceeds to retire $146,080,000 of 6.125 percent
Senior Notes which matured on March 15, 2004, as well as for other general
corporate purposes. A portion of the remaining net proceeds was also used to pay
off the $52,455,000 of 7.875 percent Senior Notes which matured August 15, 2004.
On June 25, 2004, Panhandle completed an exchange of the unregistered 2.75
percent Senior Notes due 2007, Series A, for substantially identical securities
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Cash
flows used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005
increased by approximately $64 million versus the same period in 2004 primarily
due to net debt issuances of approximately $48 million in 2004 versus
approximately $3 million in net debt retirements in 2005. In addition, bank
overdrafts decreased by approximately $14 million.
Outlook
Panhandle
is a leading United States interstate natural gas pipeline system and also owns
one of the largest operating LNG regasification terminals in North America.
Panhandle’s business strategy is to optimize results through expansion and
better utilization of its existing facilities and construction of new
facilities. This involves providing additional transportation, storage and other
value-added services to Panhandle’s customers, which include gas-fueled power
plants, local distribution companies, industrial end-users, marketers and
others. Panhandle conducts operations primarily in the central, gulf coast,
midwest, great lakes, and southwest regions of the United States. Pipeline
revenues are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters of each year
primarily due to higher contract rates and the increase in customer demand
levels for gas due to the colder weather during these periods.
Trunkline
LNG entered into a 22-year contract with BG LNG Services beginning January 2002,
for all the uncommitted capacity at the Lake Charles, Louisiana facility.
Trunkline LNG announced the planned expansion of the Lake Charles facility to
approximately 1.2 bcf per day of send out capacity, up from its current send out
capacity of .63 bcf per day and in December 2002 the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (the FERC)
approved the expansion of the LNG regasification terminal. The expanded facility
is currently expected to be in operation by the end of 2005. In September 2004,
the FERC approved Trunkline LNG’s further incremental LNG expansion project.
This expansion will increase the LNG terminal’s sustainable send out capacity to
1.8 bcf per day by mid-2006. BG LNG Services has contracted for all the proposed
additional capacity subject to Trunkline LNG achieving certain construction
milestones in the expansion of this facility.
On
February 11, 2005, Trunkline received approval from the FERC to construct, own
and operate a 36-inch diameter, 23-mile natural gas pipeline loop from the LNG
terminal. The pipeline creates additional transport capacity in association with
the Trunkline LNG expansion and also includes new and expanded delivery points
with major interstate pipelines.
In August
2005, Trunkline announced preliminary plans to expand its natural gas pipeline
in East Texas through construction of an approximately 45 mile, 30-inch pipeline
loop into Louisiana. The expansion project, which is subject to regulatory
approval, will give customers increased access to additional Texas supply
and provide an additional capacity of approximately .4 bcf/day. The expansion is
estimated to be in service in 2007 at an estimated cost of $80
million.
Other
Matters
Customer
Concentration. Panhandle
provides LNG terminalling and regasification services and a comprehensive array
of transportation and storage services to approximately five hundred customers.
Such customers are principally located in the midwest and southwest regions of
the United States. The following is a comparison of the percent of operating
revenue by customer for the six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and
2004.
|
|
|
Percent
of Operating Revenue for |
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June
30, |
|
Customer |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProLiance |
|
|
17 |
|
|
17 |
|
BG
LNG Services |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
|
Ameren |
|
|
11 |
|
|
9 |
|
CMS
Energy subsidiaries (1) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
Other
Top 10 customers |
|
|
15 |
|
|
19 |
|
Remaining
customers |
|
|
33 |
|
|
30 |
|
Total
percentage |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Primarily Consumers Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulation. Panhandle
is subject to regulation by various federal, state and local governmental
agencies, including those specifically described below.
The FERC
has comprehensive jurisdiction over Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line, Trunkline, Sea
Robin, Trunkline LNG, and Southwest Gas Storage as natural gas companies within
the meaning of the Natural Gas Act of 1938. The FERC jurisdiction relates, among
other things, to the acquisition, operation and disposal of assets and
facilities and to the service provided and rates charged.
The FERC
has authority to regulate rates and charges for both transportation and storage
of natural gas in interstate commerce. The FERC also has authority over the
construction and operation of pipeline and related facilities utilized in the
transportation and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce, including the
extension, enlargement or abandonment of service of such facilities. Panhandle,
Trunkline, Sea Robin, Trunkline LNG, and Southwest Gas Storage hold certificates
of public convenience and necessity issued by the FERC, authorizing them to
construct and operate the pipelines, facilities and properties now in operation
for which such certificates are required, and to transport and store natural gas
in interstate commerce.
The U.S.
Secretary of Energy regulates the importation and exportation of natural gas and
has delegated various aspects of this jurisdiction to the FERC and the U.S.
Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Fuels.
Panhandle
is subject to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 and the Pipeline
Safety Improvement Act of 2002, which regulate the safety of gas pipelines.
Panhandle is also subject to the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act of 1979,
which regulates oil and petroleum pipelines.
In 1993,
the U.S. Department of the Interior announced its intention to seek, through its
Mineral Management Service (MMS),
additional royalties from gas producers as a result of payments received by such
producers in connection with past take-or-pay settlements and buyouts and
buydowns of gas sales contracts with natural gas pipelines. Panhandle Eastern
Pipe Line and Trunkline, with respect to certain producer contract settlements,
may be contractually required to reimburse or, in some instances, to indemnify
producers against such royalty claims. The potential liability of the producers
to the government and of the pipelines to the producers involves complex issues
of law and fact, which are likely to take substantial time to resolve. If
required to reimburse or indemnify the producers, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
and Trunkline may file with the FERC to recover these costs from pipeline
customers. Management believes these commitments and contingencies will not have
a material adverse effect on Panhandle’s business, financial condition or
results of operations.
On
November 22, 2004, the FERC issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in
“Policy for Selective Discounting By Natural Gas Pipelines,” Docket No. RM05-2,
et al. In the NOI, the FERC requested comments from the industry on whether the
selective discounting policy should continue (including its policy in rate cases
to allow pipelines to downward adjust volumes flowing at a discounted rate, for
the purpose of determining rates), be modified, or eliminated entirely. On May
31, 2005, the FERC upheld its current policy on selective discounting.
On June
30, 2005, the FERC issued an order, subject to rehearing, on accounting for
pipeline assessment costs which requires pipeline companies to expense rather
than capitalize certain costs related to mandated pipeline integrity programs
(under the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002). The accounting release
determined that assessment activities associated with an integrity management
program must be accounted for as maintenance and charged to expense in the
period incurred. Costs associated with any remediation or rehabilitation can be
capitalized. The accounting guidance is now proposed to be effective January 1,
2006. Panhandle is currently reviewing the implications of the FERC accounting
order.
Environmental
Matters. Panhandle's
gas transmission operations are subject to federal, state and local regulations
regarding water quality, hazardous and solid waste management, air quality
control and other environmental matters. Panhandle has previously identified
environmental contamination at certain sites on its gas transmission systems and
has undertaken cleanup programs at these sites. The contamination resulted from
the past use of lubricants containing PCBs in compressed air systems; the past
use of paints containing PCBs; and the prior use of wastewater collection
facilities and other on-site disposal areas. Panhandle has developed and
implemented a program to remediate such contamination in accordance with
federal, state and local regulations. Air quality control regulations include
rules relating to regional ozone control and hazardous air pollutants. The
regional ozone control rules, known as SIP Call, are designed to control the
release of NOx compounds. The rules related to hazardous air pollutants, known
as MACT rules, are the result of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments that regulate
the emission of hazardous air pollutants from internal combustion engines and
turbines.
PCB
Assessment and Clean-up Programs -- Panhandle
previously identified environmental contamination at certain sites on its
systems and undertook clean-up programs at these sites. The contamination
resulted from the past use of lubricants containing PCBs in compressed air
systems and the prior use of wastewater collection facilities and other on-site
disposal areas. Panhandle is also taking actions regarding PCBs in paints at
various locations. For further information, see Note
IX - Commitments and Contingencies - Environmental Matters.
Air
Quality Control -- In 1998,
the EPA issued a final rule on regional ozone control that requires revised SIPs
for twenty-two states, including five states in which Panhandle operates.
Panhandle will have completed installation of NOx controls on fourteen engines
by the end of 2005 and anticipates placing NOx controls on engines at a total of
six compressor station locations. This program is expected to be completed by
May 2007.
On July
26, 2005, the Illinois EPA distributed a draft of a rule to control NOx
emissions from reciprocating engines and turbines state-wide by May 1, 2007. The
state is requiring the controls to comply with the EPA rules regarding the NOx
SIP Call, ozone non-attainment and fine particulate standards. The agency is
holding a meeting on August 23, 2005 to discuss the draft rule. The agency is
expected to propose the rule this fall. The rule is currently being reviewed for
potential impact to Panhandle. In the event the rule is adopted as drafted, it
would apply to all Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and Trunkline stations in
Illinois and significant expenditures would be required for emission
controls.
In 2004,
final rules were promulgated by the EPA regarding control of hazardous air
pollutants. Over twenty Panhandle engines require controls. MACT controls must
be installed by June 2007. In 2002, the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality enacted the Houston/Galveston SIP regulations requiring reductions in
NOx emissions in an eight-county area surrounding Houston. Trunkline’s Cypress
compressor station is affected and requires the installation of emission
controls. New regulations also require certain grandfathered facilities to enter
into the new source permit program which may require the installation of
emission controls at five additional facilities. The rule affects one company
facility owned and operated by Panhandle. Panhandle expects controls to be
installed by March 2007. For further information, see Note
IX - Commitments and Contingencies - Environmental Matters.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual
Obligations. On
September 10, 2003, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line provided a guarantee to CB&I
Constructors, Inc. for the full performance by Trunkline LNG, its subsidiary, of
the engineering, procurement and construction contract between Trunkline LNG and
CB&I Constructors, Inc. Under the terms of the guarantee, Panhandle Eastern
Pipe Line would be required to perform should Trunkline LNG be in default of its
payment obligations regarding services already rendered. There are no amounts
being carried as liabilities for Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line’s obligations under
these guarantees. See Note
IX - Commitments and Contingencies.
Contractual
Commitments.
Panhandle has contractual obligations with regard to future payments of
operating leases, debt and natural gas storage service. The following table
summarizes Panhandle’s expected contractual obligations and commitments at June
30, 2005.
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
Total |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Leases (1) |
|
$ |
6,769 |
|
$ |
13,320 |
|
$ |
11,366 |
|
$ |
7,491 |
|
$ |
6,245 |
|
$ |
22,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
long term debt (2) |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
455,626
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
60,623
|
|
|
356,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
payments on debt (3) |
|
|
28,630
|
|
|
57,301
|
|
|
44,751
|
|
|
36,048
|
|
|
25,242
|
|
|
146,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm
capacity payments (4) |
|
|
5,718
|
|
|
10,633
|
|
|
8,841
|
|
|
7,396
|
|
|
7,127
|
|
|
31,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPEB
funding (5) |
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
45,023 |
|
$ |
89,066 |
|
$ |
528,396 |
|
$ |
358,747 |
|
$ |
107,049 |
|
$ |
556,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Lease of various assets utilized for operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
Debt principal obligations (includes April 2005 LNG Holdings bank loan
refinancing impact) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
Interest payments at stated rate for Senior Notes and assumed variable
rate of approximately 4.0 percent for LNG Holdings bank loans
|
(includes April 2005 LNG Holdings bank loan refinancing
impact) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
Lease of third party storage capacity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
Panhandle is committed to the funding levels of $7.8 million per year
until modified by future rate proceedings, the timing of which is
uncertain |
|
Capital
Expenditures. Panhandle
estimates expenditures associated with Phase I and Phase II LNG terminal
expansion and the Trunkline 36-inch diameter, 23-mile natural gas pipeline loop
from the LNG terminal to be approximately $54 million for the remainder of 2005
and approximately $10 million in 2006, plus capitalized interest. These
estimates were developed for budget planning purposes and are subject to
revision.
Controlled
Group Pension Liabilities. Southern
Union (including certain of its divisions) sponsors a number of defined benefit
pension plans arising from its (including any of its present or former
divisions) or its predecessor’s businesses when Southern Union acquired
Panhandle. Under applicable pension and tax laws, upon being acquired by
Southern Union, Panhandle became a member of Southern Union’s “controlled group”
with respect to those plans, and, along with Southern Union and any other
members of that group, is jointly and severally liable for any failure by
Southern Union (along with any other persons that may be or become a sponsor of
any such plan) to fund any of these pension plans or to pay any unfunded
liabilities that these plans may have if they are ever terminated. In addition,
if any of the obligations of any of these pension plans is not paid when due, a
lien in favor of that plan or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation may be
created against the assets of each member of Southern Union’s controlled group,
including Panhandle. Based on the latest actuarial information available as of
December 31, 2004, the aggregate amount of the projected benefit obligations of
these pension plans was approximately $398,516,000 and the estimated fair value
of all of the assets of these plans was approximately $276,836,000.
CCE
Holdings Acquisition of CrossCountry Energy. On
November 17, 2004, CCE Holdings, LLC (CCE), a
joint venture in which Southern Union owns a 50 percent interest, acquired 100
percent of the equity interests of CrossCountry Energy, LLC (CrossCountry) from
Enron Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries for approximately $2,450,000,000 in
cash, including certain consolidated debt. On November 5, 2004, CCE entered into
an Administrative Services Agreement (the
Management Agreement) with
Panhandle and SU Pipeline Management LP (Manager), a
Delaware limited partnership and wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Union.
Under the terms of the Management Agreement, Panhandle covenants, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, to cause Manager to perform the duties and
obligations of Manager. Manager has assembled an integrated pipeline management
team, which includes employees of Panhandle and CrossCountry. Pursuant to the
Management Agreement, Manager is responsible for the operations and
administrative functions of CCE and its subsidiaries. CCE and Manager will share
certain operations of Manager and its affiliates, and CCE will be obligated to
bear its share of costs of Manager and its affiliates, as well as certain
transition costs and, under certain conditions, pay annual management fees to
Manager. Transition costs are non-recurring costs of establishing the shared
services, including but not limited to severance costs, professional fees,
certain transaction costs, and the costs of relocating offices and personnel,
pursuant to the Management Agreement.
There are
no material changes in market risks faced by Panhandle from those reported in
Panhandle’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004.
The
information in Item 3 updates, and should be read in conjunction with,
information set forth in Part II, Item 7 and Item 7A in Panhandle’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, in addition to the
interim consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes, and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
presented in Items 1 and 2 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Panhandle
performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and
with the participation of personnel from its Legal, Internal Audit and Financial
Reporting Departments, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Panhandle’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on that evaluation, Panhandle’s CEO and CFO concluded that
its disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2005 and
have communicated that determination to the Board of Managers and Southern
Union’s Audit Committee, which also serves as our Audit Committee.
Changes
in Internal Controls
Management
is not aware of any change in Panhandle’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has
materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect Panhandle’s
internal controls over financial reporting.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information.
The
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition and other sections of this Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These statements constitute forward-looking statements that are based on
current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry in which
Panhandle operates and management’s beliefs and assumptions. These
forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather reflect current
expectations concerning future results and events. Words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations
of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. Similarly, statements that describe objectives,
plans or goals are or may be forward-looking statements.
These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve various risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which
are outside of Panhandle’s control. Therefore, actual results, performance and
achievements may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such
forward-looking statements. Prospective investors may review Panhandle Eastern
Pipe Line’s reports filed in the future with the Commission for more current
descriptions of developments that could cause actual results to differ
materially from such forward-looking statements. However, prospective investors
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only
as of the date of this Form 10-Q, or, in the case of documents incorporated by
reference, the date of those documents.
Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
customer growth; gas throughput volumes and available sources of natural gas;
discounting of transportation rates due to competition, abnormal weather
conditions in Panhandle’s service territories; new legislation and government
regulations affecting or involving Panhandle; Panhandle’s ability to comply with
or to challenge successfully existing or new environmental regulations; the
outcome of pending and future litigation; the impact of relations with labor
unions of bargaining-unit union employees; the impact of future rate cases or
regulatory rulings; Panhandle’s ability to control costs successfully and
achieve operating efficiencies, including the purchase and implementation of new
technologies for achieving such efficiencies; the nature and impact of any
extraordinary transactions, such as any acquisition or divestiture of a business
unit or any assets; the economic climate and growth in Panhandle’s industry and
service territories and competitive conditions of energy markets in general;
inflationary trends; changes in gas or other energy market commodity prices and
interest rates; the current market conditions causing more customer contracts to
be of shorter duration, which may increase revenue volatility; exposure to
customer concentration with a significant portion of revenues realized from a
relatively small number of customers and any credit risks associated with the
financial position of those customers; Panhandle or its parent’s debt securities
ratings; factors affecting operations such as maintenance or repairs,
environmental incidents or gas pipeline system constraints; the possibility of
war or terrorist attacks; and other risks and unforeseen events.
In light
of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the results reflected in the
forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Form
10-Q might not occur. In addition, Panhandle could be affected by general
industry and market conditions, and general economic conditions, including
interest rate fluctuations, federal, state and local laws and regulations
affecting the retail gas industry or the energy industry generally.
Panhandle
does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us or persons acting on Panhandle’s behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout
this Form 10-Q.
ITEM
1. Legal Proceedings
Panhandle
and certain of its affiliates are occasionally parties to lawsuits and
administrative proceedings incidental to their businesses involving, for
example, claims for personal injury and property damage, contractual matters,
various tax matters, and rates and licensing. Reference is made to ITEM
1. Financial Statements, Note IX -- Commitments and Contingencies - Litigation,
Environmental Matters, Air Quality Control, Other Contingencies and Controlled
Group Pension Liabilities, as well
as to ITEM
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included
in Part
I. Financial Information for
additional information regarding various pending administrative and judicial
proceedings involving regulatory, environmental and other legal
matters.
Environmental
Matters -
Panhandle and its affiliates are subject to various federal, state and local
laws and regulations relating to the environment. Several of these companies
have been named parties to various actions involving environmental issues. Based
on our present knowledge and subject to future legal and factual developments,
Panhandle’s management believes that it is unlikely that these actions,
individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition. See
ITEM 1. Financial Statements, Note IX - Commitments and Contingencies -
Environmental Matters and Air Quality Control and ITEM
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included
in Part
I. Financial Information.
Item 2,
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, has been omitted
from this report pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General
Instruction H to Form 10-Q.
Item 3,
Defaults Upon Senior Securities, has been omitted from this report pursuant to
the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H to Form
10-Q.
Item 4,
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders, has been omitted from this
report pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General
Instruction H to Form 10-Q.
N/A
Exhibit
No.
Description
|
|
|
Credit
Agreement dated as of April 26, 2005 by and among Trunkline LNG Holdings
LLC as the Borrower, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP as a
Guarantor, Trunkline LNG Company, LLC as a Guarantor, and the Banks named
therein and Bayerische Hypo- Und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch as the
Agent, the Sole Book Runner and the Sole Lead Arranger (Filed as Exhibit
10.1 to Panhandle's Current Report on Form
8-K filed on May 2, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
Certificate
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) or 15d - 14(a)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
Certificate
by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) or 15d - 14(a)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
Certificate
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(b) or 15d - 14(b)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
Certificate
by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(b) or 15d - 14(b)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350. |
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Panhandle Eastern
Pipe Line Company, LP has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
PANHANDLE
EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP |
|
|
|
|
Date:
August 9, 2005 |
By:
/s/
THOMAS
F. KARAM |
|
Thomas
F. Karam |
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit
31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Thomas
F. Karam, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP;
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) |
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
(b) |
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
(c) |
Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) |
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
(b) |
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting. |
Date: August 9,
2005
/s/
THOMAS F. KARAM
Thomas F.
Karam
Chief
Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit
31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Julie
H. Edwards, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP;
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) |
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
(b) |
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
(c) |
Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) |
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
(b) |
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting. |
Date:
August 9, 2005
/s/
JULIE H. EDWARDS
Julie H.
Edwards
Senior
Vice President and
Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit
32.1
Certification
Pursuant to
18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
Adopted Pursuant to
Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas F. Karam, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
/s/
THOMAS F. KARAM
Name:
Thomas F. Karam
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
Date:
August 9, 2005
This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
Exhibit
32.2
Certification
Pursuant to
18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
Adopted Pursuant to
Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Julie H. Edwards, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
/s/
JULIE H. EDWARDS
Name:
Julie H. Edwards
Title:
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:
August 9, 2005
This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.