Energy Transfer Reports Fourth Quarter 2018 Results with Record Performance and Continued Growth
-
Net income attributable to partners of
$617 million , reflecting an increase over previous periods primarily due to the impact of the Merger. -
Record Adjusted EBITDA of
$2.67 billion , up 29 percent from the fourth quarter of 2017. -
Record Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners of
$1.52 billion , up 29 percent from the fourth quarter of 2017. -
Distribution coverage ratio of 1.90x, yielding excess coverage of
$716 million of Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners in excess of distributions. -
Reaffirms 2019 outlook for Adjusted EBITDA of
$10.6 billion to $10.8 billion and capital expenditures of approximately $5 billion.
ET reported net income attributable to partners for the three months
ended
Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended
On a pro forma basis for the Merger, Distributable Cash Flow
attributable to partners, as adjusted, for the three months ended
Key accomplishments and current developments:
Strategic
-
ET and Energy Transfer Operating, L.P. (“ETO”, formerlyEnergy Transfer Partners, L.P. or “ETP”) completed a simplification merger transaction onOctober 19, 2018 (the “Merger”) whereby the publicly held common units of ETP were exchanged for 1.28 common units of ET. Consequently, the former common unitholders of ETP, along with the existing common unitholders of ET, now comprise the current common unitholders of ET.
Operational
-
Frac VI, a 150,000 barrel per day fractionator at
Mont Belvieu , was placed in service inFebruary 2019 . -
Bakken Pipeline completed a successful open season in
January 2019 to bring the current system capacity to 570,000 barrels per day. -
The
North Texas natural gas pipeline 160,000 MMBtu per day expansion was placed in service inJanuary 2019 . -
Mariner East 2, a 350-mile NGL pipeline, was placed into service for
both intrastate and interstate service in
December 2018 . -
Construction of a 150,000 barrel per day fractionator (Frac VII) at
Mont Belvieu and Lone Star Express 352-mile NGL pipeline expansion were announced inNovember 2018 .
Financial
-
In
January 2019, ET announced a quarterly distribution of$0.305 per unit ($1.220 annualized) on ET common units for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2018 . -
In
January 2019 , ETO issued an aggregate$4.00 billion principal amount of senior notes and used the net proceeds to repay in full ET’s outstanding senior secured term loan, redeem certain outstanding senior notes at maturity, repay a portion of the borrowings outstanding under ET’s revolving credit facility and for general partnership purposes. -
As of
December 31, 2018 , ETO’s$6.00 billion revolving credit facilities had an aggregate$2.24 billion of available capacity, and ETO’s leverage ratio, as defined by its credit agreement, was 3.38x.
Conference call information:
The Partnership has scheduled a conference call for
Subsequent to the Merger, substantially all of the Partnership’s cash
flows are derived from distributions related to its investment in ETO,
whose cash flows are derived from its subsidiaries, including ETO’s
investments in the limited and general partner interests in
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release may include certain statements concerning expectations
for the future that are forward-looking statements as defined by federal
law. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known
and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that are difficult
to predict and many of which are beyond management’s control. An
extensive list of factors that can affect future results are discussed
in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents
filed from time to time with the
The information contained in this press release is available on our website at www.energytransfer.com.
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | $ | 6,750 | $ | 10,683 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 66,963 | 61,088 | ||||||
Advances to and investments in unconsolidated affiliates | 2,642 | 2,705 | ||||||
Other non-current assets, net | 1,006 | 886 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 6,000 | 6,116 | ||||||
Goodwill | 4,885 | 4,768 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 88,246 | $ | 86,246 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities | $ | 9,310 | $ | 7,897 | ||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 43,373 | 43,671 | ||||||
Non-current derivative liabilities | 104 | 145 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 2,926 | 3,315 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities | 1,184 | 1,217 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests | 499 | 21 | ||||||
Equity: | ||||||||
Total partners’ capital (deficit) | 20,559 | (1,196 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interest | 10,291 | 31,176 | ||||||
Total equity | 30,850 | 29,980 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 88,246 | $ | 86,246 | ||||
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
REVENUES | $ | 13,573 | $ | 11,451 | $ | 54,087 | $ | 40,523 | ||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of products sold | 9,977 | 8,721 | 41,658 | 30,966 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 809 | 704 | 3,089 | 2,644 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 750 | 677 | 2,859 | 2,554 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 187 | 119 | 702 | 599 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses | 431 | 940 | 431 | 1,039 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 12,154 | 11,161 | 48,739 | 37,802 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME | 1,419 | 290 | 5,348 | 2,721 | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized | (544 | ) | (482 | ) | (2,055 | ) | (1,922 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates | 86 | (84 | ) | 344 | 144 | |||||||||||
Impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliate | — | (313 | ) | — | (313 | ) | ||||||||||
Losses on extinguishments of debt | (6 | ) | (64 | ) | (112 | ) | (89 | ) | ||||||||
Gains (losses) on interest rate derivatives | (70 | ) | (9 | ) | 47 | (37 | ) | |||||||||
Other, net | (35 | ) | 73 | 62 | 206 | |||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | 850 | (589 | ) | 3,634 | 710 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations | (2 | ) | (1,747 | ) | 4 | (1,833 | ) | |||||||||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | 852 | 1,158 | 3,630 | 2,543 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | — | 10 | (265 | ) | (177 | ) | ||||||||||
NET INCOME | 852 | 1,168 | 3,365 | 2,366 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 220 | 917 | 1,632 | 1,412 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | 15 | — | 39 | — | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PARTNERS | 617 | 251 | 1,694 | 954 | ||||||||||||
Convertible Unitholders’ interest in income | — | 12 | 33 | 37 | ||||||||||||
General Partner’s interest in net income | — | — | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Limited Partners’ interest in net income | $ | 617 | $ | 239 | $ | 1,658 | $ | 915 | ||||||||
NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF UNITS OUTSTANDING: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 2,332.1 | 1,079.2 | 1,423.8 | 1,078.2 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 2,339.4 | 1,151.5 | 1,461.4 | 1,150.8 | ||||||||||||
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION |
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars and units in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
Reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow (a) (b): | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 852 | $ | 1,168 | $ | 3,365 | $ | 2,366 | ||||||||
(Income) loss from discontinued operations | — | (10 | ) | 265 | 177 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 544 | 482 | 2,055 | 1,922 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses | 431 | 940 | 431 | 1,039 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations | (2 | ) | (1,747 | ) | 4 | (1,833 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 750 | 677 | 2,859 | 2,554 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash compensation expense | 23 | 23 | 105 | 99 | ||||||||||||
(Gains) losses on interest rate derivatives | 70 | 9 | (47 | ) | 37 | |||||||||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on commodity risk management activities | (244 | ) | (37 | ) | 11 | (59 | ) | |||||||||
Losses on extinguishments of debt | 6 | 64 | 112 | 89 | ||||||||||||
Inventory valuation adjustments | 135 | (16 | ) | 85 | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment of investment in an unconsolidated affiliate | — | 313 | — | 313 | ||||||||||||
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates | (86 | ) | 84 | (344 | ) | (144 | ) | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | 152 | 162 | 655 | 716 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA from discontinued operations | — | 44 | (25 | ) | 223 | |||||||||||
Other, net | 38 | (79 | ) | (21 | ) | (155 | ) | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (consolidated) | 2,669 | 2,077 | 9,510 | 7,320 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | (152 | ) | (162 | ) | (655 | ) | (716 | ) | ||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow from unconsolidated affiliates | 95 | 102 | 407 | 431 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | (544 | ) | (497 | ) | (2,057 | ) | (1,958 | ) | ||||||||
Subsidiary preferred unitholders’ distributions | (54 | ) | (12 | ) | (170 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||
Current income tax expense | (7 | ) | (10 | ) | (472 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||
Transaction-related income taxes | — | — | 470 | — | ||||||||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures | (137 | ) | (157 | ) | (510 | ) | (479 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net | 19 | 5 | 49 | 67 | ||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow (consolidated) | 1,889 | 1,346 | 6,572 | 4,614 | ||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to Sunoco LP (100%) | (115 | ) | (89 | ) | (446 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions from Sunoco LP | 43 | 68 | 166 | 259 | ||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to USAC (100%) | (55 | ) | — | (148 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Distributions from USAC | 21 | — | 73 | — | ||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to PennTex Midstream Partners, LP (“PennTex”) (100%) (c) | — | — | — | (19 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions from PennTex to ETO (c) | — | — | — | 8 | ||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to noncontrolling interest in other non-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries | (294 | ) | (151 | ) | (874 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to the partners of ET – pro forma for the Merger (a) | 1,489 | 1,174 | 5,343 | 4,063 | ||||||||||||
Transaction-related expenses | 27 | 4 | 52 | 57 | ||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to the partners of ET, as adjusted – pro forma for the Merger (a) | $ | 1,516 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 5,395 | $ | 4,120 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to partners – pro forma for the Merger (a): | |||||||||||||||
Limited Partners (d) | $ | 799 | $ | 708 | $ | 3,104 | $ | 2,669 | |||||||
General Partner | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
Total distributions to be paid to partners | $ | 800 | $ | 709 | $ | 3,108 | $ | 2,673 | |||||||
Common Units outstanding – end of period – pro forma for the Merger (a) | 2,619.4 | 2,532.5 | 2,619.4 | 2,532.5 | |||||||||||
Distribution coverage ratio – pro forma for the Merger (a)(b) | 1.90x | 1.66x | 1.74x | 1.54x | |||||||||||
(a) The closing of the Merger (as discussed above) has impacted the Partnership’s calculation of Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners, as well as the number of ET Common Units outstanding and the amount of distributions to be paid to partners. In order to provide information on a comparable basis for pre-Merger and post-Merger periods, the Partnership has included certain pro forma information.
Pro forma Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners reflects the following merger related impacts:
- ETO is reflected as a wholly-owned subsidiary and pro forma Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners reflects ETO’s consolidated Distributable Cash Flow (less certain other adjustments, as follows).
-
Distributions from
Sunoco LP and USAC include distributions to both ET and ETO. - Distributions from PennTex are separately included in Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners.
- Distributable Cash Flow attributable to noncontrolling interest in our other non-wholly-owned subsidiaries is subtracted from consolidated Distributable Cash Flow to calculate Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners.
Pro forma distributions to partners include actual distributions to legacy ET partners, as well as pro forma distributions to legacy ETO partners. Pro forma distributions to ETO partners are calculated assuming (i) historical ETO common units converted under the terms of the Merger and (ii) distributions on such converted common units were paid at the historical rate paid on ET Common Units.
Pro forma Common Units outstanding include actual Common Units outstanding, in addition to Common Units assumed to be issued in the Merger, which are based on historical ETO common units converted under the terms of the Merger.
For the year ended
(b) Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow and distribution coverage ratio are non-GAAP financial measures used by industry analysts, investors, lenders, and rating agencies to assess the financial performance and the operating results of ET’s fundamental business activities and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, income from operations, cash flows from operating activities, or other GAAP measures.
There are material limitations to using measures such as Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow and distribution coverage ratio, including the difficulty associated with using either as the sole measure to compare the results of one company to another, and the inability to analyze certain significant items that directly affect a company’s net income or loss or cash flows. In addition, our calculations of Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow and distribution coverage ratio may not be consistent with similarly titled measures of other companies and should be viewed in conjunction with measurements that are computed in accordance with GAAP, such as segment margin, operating income, net income, and cash flow from operating activities.
Definition of Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as total partnership earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization and other non-cash items, such as non-cash compensation expense, gains and losses on disposals of assets, the allowance for equity funds used during construction, unrealized gains and losses on commodity risk management activities, non-cash impairment charges, losses on extinguishments of debt and other non-operating income or expense items. Unrealized gains and losses on commodity risk management activities include unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives and inventory fair value adjustments (excluding lower of cost or market adjustments). Adjusted EBITDA reflects amounts for less than wholly-owned subsidiaries based on 100% of the subsidiaries’ results of operations and for unconsolidated affiliates based on our proportionate ownership.
Adjusted EBITDA is used by management to determine our operating performance and, along with other financial and volumetric data, as internal measures for setting annual operating budgets, assessing financial performance of our numerous business locations, as a measure for evaluating targeted businesses for acquisition and as a measurement component of incentive compensation.
Definition of Distributable Cash Flow
We define Distributable Cash Flow as net income, adjusted for certain non-cash items, less distributions to preferred unitholders and maintenance capital expenditures. Non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, non-cash compensation expense, amortization included in interest expense, gains and losses on disposals of assets, the allowance for equity funds used during construction, unrealized gains and losses on commodity risk management activities, non-cash impairment charges, losses on extinguishments of debt and deferred income taxes. Unrealized gains and losses on commodity risk management activities includes unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives and inventory fair value adjustments (excluding lower of cost or market adjustments). For unconsolidated affiliates, Distributable Cash Flow reflects the Partnership’s proportionate share of the investee’s distributable cash flow.
Distributable Cash Flow is used by management to evaluate our overall performance. Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all available cash, and Distributable Cash Flow is calculated to evaluate our ability to fund distributions through cash generated by our operations.
On a consolidated basis, Distributable Cash Flow includes 100% of the Distributable Cash Flow of ET’s consolidated subsidiaries. However, to the extent that noncontrolling interests exist among our subsidiaries, the Distributable Cash Flow generated by our subsidiaries may not be available to be distributed to our partners. In order to reflect the cash flows available for distributions to our partners, we have reported Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners, which is calculated by adjusting Distributable Cash Flow (consolidated), as follows:
- For subsidiaries with publicly traded equity interests, other than ETO, Distributable Cash Flow (consolidated) includes 100% of Distributable Cash Flow attributable to such subsidiary, and Distributable Cash Flow attributable to our partners includes distributions to be received by the parent company with respect to the periods presented.
- For consolidated joint ventures or similar entities, where the noncontrolling interest is not publicly traded, Distributable Cash Flow (consolidated) includes 100% of Distributable Cash Flow attributable to such subsidiaries, but Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners reflects only the amount of Distributable Cash Flow of such subsidiaries that is attributable to our ownership interest.
For Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners, as adjusted, certain transaction-related and non-recurring expenses that are included in net income are excluded.
Definition of Distribution Coverage Ratio
Distribution coverage ratio for a period is calculated as Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partners, as adjusted, divided by distributions expected to be paid to the partners of ET in respect of such period.
(c) Beginning with the second quarter of 2017, PennTex became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of ETO. The amounts reflected above for PennTex
relate only to the first quarter of 2017, and no distributable cash flow
has been attributed to noncontrolling interests in PennTex subsequent to
(d) Includes distributions to unitholders who elected to participate in
a plan to forgo a portion of their future potential cash distributions
on common units and reinvest those distributions in ETE Series A
convertible preferred units representing limited partner interests in
the Partnership. The quarter ended
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||
SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY RESULTS BY SEGMENT | ||||||
(Tabular dollar amounts in millions) | ||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||
As a result of the Merger in October 2018, our reportable segments were reevaluated and currently reflect the following segments. |
||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA: | ||||||
Intrastate transportation and storage | $ | 306 | $ | 146 | ||
Interstate transportation and storage | 479 | 342 | ||||
Midstream | 402 | 393 | ||||
NGL and refined products transportation and services | 569 | 433 | ||||
Crude oil transportation and services | 636 | 544 | ||||
Investment in Sunoco LP | 180 | 158 | ||||
Investment in USAC | 104 | — | ||||
All other | (7 | ) | 61 | |||
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 2,669 | $ | 2,077 |
In the following analysis of segment operating results, a measure of segment margin is reported for segments with sales revenues. Segment Margin is a non-GAAP financial measure and is presented herein to assist in the analysis of segment operating results and particularly to facilitate an understanding of the impacts that changes in sales revenues have on the segment performance measure of Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Segment Margin is similar to the GAAP measure of gross margin, except that Segment Margin excludes charges for depreciation, depletion and amortization.
In addition, for certain segments, the sections below include information on the components of Segment Margin by sales type, which components are included in order to provide additional disaggregated information to facilitate the analysis of Segment Margin and Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For example, these components include transportation margin, storage margin, and other margin. These components of Segment Margin are calculated consistent with the calculation of Segment Margin; therefore, these components also exclude charges for depreciation, depletion and amortization.
Following is a reconciliation of Segment Margin to operating income, as reported in the Partnership’s consolidated statements of operations:
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Segment Margin: | ||||||||
Intrastate transportation and storage | $ | 350 | $ | 205 | ||||
Interstate transportation and storage | 495 | 317 | ||||||
Midstream | 609 | 568 | ||||||
NGL and refined products transportation and services | 840 | 582 | ||||||
Crude oil transportation and services | 939 | 683 | ||||||
Investment in Sunoco LP | 183 | 277 | ||||||
Investment in USAC | 149 | — | ||||||
All other | 45 | 102 | ||||||
Intersegment eliminations | (14 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Total segment margin | 3,596 | 2,730 | ||||||
Less: | ||||||||
Operating expenses | 809 | 704 | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 750 | 677 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 187 | 119 | ||||||
Impairment losses | 431 | 940 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 1,419 | $ | 290 |
Intrastate Transportation and Storage |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Natural gas transported (BBtu/d) | 11,708 | 8,944 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,127 | $ | 741 | ||||
Cost of products sold | 777 | 536 | ||||||
Segment margin | 350 | 205 | ||||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on commodity risk management activities | 5 | (21 | ) | |||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (48 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (7 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | 6 | 11 | ||||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 306 | $ | 146 |
Transported volumes increased primarily due to favorable market pricing
spreads, as well as the impact of reflecting
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
an increase of
$154 million in realized natural gas sales and other due to higher realized gains from pipeline optimization activity; and -
a net increase of
$13 million due to the consolidation of RIGS beginning inApril 2018 , resulting in increases in transportation fees, retained fuel revenues, operating expenses, and selling, general and administrative expenses of$24 million ,$2 million ,$5 million and$2 million , respectively, and a decrease of$6 million in Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates; partially offset by -
a decrease of
$7 million in realized storage margin primarily due to lower realized derivative gains; and -
a decrease of
$2 million in transportation fees, excluding the impact of consolidating RIGS as discussed above, primarily due to a non-recurring adjustment to a transportation services agreement, partially offset by Red Bluff Express coming online and new contracts.
Interstate Transportation and Storage |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Natural gas transported (BBtu/d) | 11,062 | 7,185 | ||||||
Natural gas sold (BBtu/d) | 18 | 18 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 495 | $ | 317 | ||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation, amortization and accretion expenses | (120 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash compensation, amortization and accretion expenses | (8 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | 118 | 115 | ||||||
Other | (6 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 479 | $ | 342 |
Transported volumes reflected an increase of 2,223 BBtu/d as a result of
the initiation of service on the Rover pipeline; increases of 506 BBtu/d
and 475 BBtu/d on the Panhandle and Trunkline pipelines, respectively,
due to increased utilization of higher contracted capacity; an increase
of 309 BBtu/d on the Tiger pipeline as a result of production increases
in the
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
an increase of
$112 million associated with the Rover pipeline with increases of$149 million in revenues,$35 million in net operating expenses and$2 million in selling, general and administrative expenses; -
an aggregate increase of
$29 million in revenues, excluding the incremental revenue related to the Rover pipeline discussed above, primarily due to capacity sold at higher rates on the Transwestern, Panhandle and Trunkline pipelines; -
an increase of
$3 million in Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates primarily related to higher sales of capacity on Citrus; and -
a decrease of
$1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding the incremental expenses related to the Rover pipeline discussed above, primarily due to a reduction in insurance reserves; partially offset by -
an increase of
$5 million in operating expenses, excluding the incremental expenses related to the Rover pipeline discussed above, primarily due to system gas expenses and increases in maintenance project costs due to scope and level of activity.
Midstream |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Gathered volumes (BBtu/d) | 12,827 | 11,525 | ||||||
NGLs produced (MBbls/d) | 558 | 505 | ||||||
Equity NGLs (MBbls/d) | 25 | 27 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,926 | ||||
Cost of products sold | 1,172 | 1,358 | ||||||
Segment margin | 609 | 568 | ||||||
Unrealized losses on commodity risk management activities | — | 3 | ||||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (193 | ) | (168 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (22 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | 8 | 8 | ||||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 402 | $ | 393 |
Gathered volumes and NGL production increased primarily due to increases
in the
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
an increase of
$49 million in fee-based margin due to growth in theNorth Texas , Permian and Northeast regions, offset by declines in theArk-La-Tex and midcontinent/Panhandle regions; and -
an increase of
$14 million in non-fee-based margin due to increased throughput volume in theNorth Texas and Permian regions; partially offset by -
a decrease of
$25 million in non-fee-based margin primarily due to lower NGL prices; -
an increase of
$25 million in operating expenses due to an increase of$8 million in materials,$6 million in outside services,$6 million in ad valorem taxes and$5 million in expense projects; and -
an increase of
$4 million in selling, general and administrative expenses due to a change in capitalized overhead.
NGL and Refined Products Transportation and Services |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
NGL transportation volumes (MBbls/d) | 1,115 | 963 | ||||||
Refined products transportation volumes (MBbls/d) | 601 | 618 | ||||||
NGL and refined products terminal volumes (MBbls/d) | 898 | 792 | ||||||
NGL fractionation volumes (MBbls/d) | 594 | 455 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,946 | $ | 2,533 | ||||
Cost of products sold | 2,106 | 1,951 | ||||||
Segment margin | 840 | 582 | ||||||
Unrealized gains on commodity risk management activities | (112 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (156 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (22 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | 19 | 14 | ||||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 569 | $ | 433 |
NGL transportation volumes increased primarily due to increased volumes from the Permian region resulting from a ramp up in production from existing customers, higher throughput volumes on Mariner West driven by end user facility constraints in the prior period and higher throughput from Mariner South resulting from increased export volumes. Refined products transportation volumes decreased primarily due to the timing of turnarounds at third-party refineries in the Midwest and Northeast regions.
NGL and refined products terminal volumes increased primarily due to
more volumes loaded at our
Average fractionated volumes at our
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
an increase of
$85 million in transportation margin primarily due to a$70 million increase resulting from higher producer volumes from the Permian region on our Texas NGL pipelines, a$9 million increase due to higher throughput volumes on Mariner West driven by end-user facility constraints in the prior period, a$5 million increase due to higher throughput volumes from the Barnett region, a$4 million increase resulting from a reclassification between our transportation and fractionation margins and a$3 million increase due to higher throughput volumes on Mariner South as a result of increased export volumes. These increases were partially offset by a$6 million decrease resulting from the timing of deficiency revenue recognition; -
an increase of
$32 million in fractionation and refinery services margin primarily due to a$43 million increase resulting from the commissioning of our fifth fractionator inJuly 2018 and higher NGL volumes from the Permian region feeding ourMont Belvieu fractionation facility. This increase was partially offset by a$5 million decrease in blending gains as a result of less favorable market pricing, a$4 million decrease resulting from a reclassification between our transportation and fractionation margins and a$2 million decrease from planned downtime at a customer facility that lowered the supply to our refinery services facility; -
an increase of
$28 million in marketing margin due to a$31 million increase from our butane blending operations and an$12 million increase in NGL sales from ourMarcus Hook Industrial Complex . These increases were partially offset by a$15 million decrease from the timing of optimization gains from ourMont Belvieu fractionators; and -
an increase of
$26 million in terminal services margin due to a$13 million increase from higher throughput at ourMarcus Hook Industrial Complex , an$11 million increase resulting from a change in the classification of certain customer reimbursements previously recorded in operating expenses and a$2 million increase at ourNederland terminal due to increased export demand; partially offset by -
an increase of
$36 million in operating expenses primarily due to a$14 million increase in operating costs primarily due to higher throughput on our NGL pipelines and fractionators and the commissioning of our fifth fractionator inJuly 2018 , an$11 million increase resulting from a change in the classification of certain customer reimbursements previously recorded as a reduction to operating expenses that are now classified as revenue following the adoption of ASC 606 onJanuary 1, 2018 , a$3 million increase in costs relating to an outside storage lease and a$3 million increase in certain allocated overhead costs; and -
an increase of
$7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses due to a$6 million increase in overhead costs allocated to the segment and$1 million increase in legal fees.
Crude Oil Transportation and Services |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Crude transportation volumes (MBbls/d) | 4,330 | 3,872 | ||||||
Crude terminals volumes (MBbls/d) | 2,202 | 2,059 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 4,346 | $ | 3,938 | ||||
Cost of products sold | 3,407 | 3,255 | ||||||
Segment margin | 939 | 683 | ||||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on commodity risk management activities | (132 | ) | 4 | |||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (150 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (22 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 636 | $ | 544 |
Crude transportation volumes increased due to placing the Bakken
pipeline in service in
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
an increase of
$120 million in segment margin (excluding unrealized gains and losses on commodity risk management activities) primarily due to the following: a$102 million increase resulting from higher throughput on the Bakken pipeline and a$125 million increase resulting from higher throughput on ourTexas crude pipeline system primarily due to increased production from Permian producers. These increases were partially offset by a$107 million decrease to segment margin (excluding a net change of$136 million in unrealized gains and losses on commodity risk management activities) from our crude oil acquisition and marketing business; partially offset by -
an increase of
$25 million in operating expenses due to a$23 million increase due to higher throughput related expenses on existing assets and a$2 million increase from the expansion of our Permian Express 3 pipeline in service in the fourth quarter of 2018; and -
an increase of
$2 million in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily due to increases in allocated shared service charges.
Investment in Sunoco LP |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 3,877 | $ | 2,959 | ||||
Cost of products sold | 3,694 | 2,682 | ||||||
Segment margin | 183 | 277 | ||||||
Unrealized losses on commodity risk management activities | 5 | 2 | ||||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (111 | ) | (113 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (36 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
Inventory fair value adjustments | 135 | (16 | ) | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA from discontinued operations | — | 44 | ||||||
Other, net | 4 | — | ||||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 180 | $ | 158 |
The Investment in
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
an increase of
$60 million in margin (excluding a$154 million change in inventory fair value adjustments and unrealized losses on commodity risk management activities) primarily due to increases in fuel margins and fuel volumes; partially offset by -
a decrease of
$44 million in Adjusted EBITDA from discontinued operations primarily due to Sunoco LP’s retail divestment inJanuary 2018 .
Investment in USAC |
|||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 172 | $ | — | |||
Cost of products sold | 23 | — | |||||
Segment margin | 149 | — | |||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (30 | ) | — | ||||
Selling, general and administrative, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (16 | ) | — | ||||
Other, net | 1 | — | |||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 104 | $ | — |
Amounts reflected above for the three months ended
All Other |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 630 | $ | 652 | ||||
Cost of products sold | 585 | 550 | ||||||
Segment margin | 45 | 102 | ||||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on commodity risk management activities | (11 | ) | 3 | |||||
Operating expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (6 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash compensation expense | (41 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | — | 12 | ||||||
Other and eliminations | 6 | 3 | ||||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 61 |
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended
-
a decrease of
$35 million due to the contribution of CDM to USAC inApril 2018 , subsequent to which CDM is reflected in the Investment in USAC segment; -
a decrease of
$29 million due to merger and acquisition expenses related to the Merger in 2018; -
a decrease of
$13 million in Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates from our investment in PES primarily due to our lower ownership in PES subsequent to its reorganization, which resulted in PES no longer being reflected as an affiliate beginning in the third quarter of 2018; and -
a decrease of
$6 million due to a decrease in power trading gains; partially offset by -
an increase of
$5 million in joint venture management fees; and -
an increase of
$4 million from transport fees and gains from storage and park and loan activity.
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON LIQUIDITY |
||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||
The following table is a summary of ETO’s revolving credit facilities which incurred certain changes in connection with the Merger. We also have consolidated subsidiaries with revolving credit facilities which are not included. | ||||||||||
Facility Size |
Funds Available at |
Maturity Date | ||||||||
ETO Five-Year Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 5,000 | $ | 1,243 | December 1, 2023 | |||||
ETO 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility | 1,000 | 1,000 | November 30, 2019 | |||||||
$ | 6,000 | $ | 2,243 | |||||||
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
The table below provides information on an aggregated basis for our unconsolidated affiliates, which are accounted for as equity method investments in the Partnership’s financial statements for the periods presented. |
||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates: | ||||||||
Citrus | $ | 39 | $ | 58 | ||||
FEP | 14 | 14 | ||||||
MEP | 7 | 9 | ||||||
HPC (1)(2) | — | (185 | ) | |||||
Other | 26 | 20 | ||||||
Total equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates | $ | 86 | $ | (84 | ) | |||
Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates: | ||||||||
Citrus | $ | 81 | $ | 74 | ||||
FEP | 18 | 19 | ||||||
MEP | 19 | 22 | ||||||
HPC (2) | — | 6 | ||||||
Other | 34 | 41 | ||||||
Total Adjusted EBITDA related to unconsolidated affiliates | $ | 152 | $ | 162 | ||||
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates: | ||||||||
Citrus | $ | 46 | $ | 43 | ||||
FEP | 18 | 19 | ||||||
MEP | 8 | 8 | ||||||
HPC (2) | — | 13 | ||||||
Other | 35 | 22 | ||||||
Total distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates | $ | 107 | $ | 105 |
(1) For the three months ended
(2) The partnership previously owned a 49.99% interest
in HPC, which owns RIGS. In
ENERGY TRANSFER LP AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON NON-WHOLLY-OWNED JOINT VENTURE SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||
(In millions) | |||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||
The table below provides information on an aggregated basis for our non-wholly-owned joint venture subsidiaries, which are reflected on a consolidated basis in our financial statements. The table below excludes Sunoco LP and USAC, which are non-wholly-owned subsidiaries that are publicly traded. |
|||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries (100%) (a) | $ | 669 | $ | 381 | |||
Our proportionate share of Adjusted EBITDA of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries (b) | 351 | 212 | |||||
Distributable Cash Flow of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries (100%) (c) | $ | 626 | $ | 346 | |||
Our proportionate share of Distributable Cash Flow of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries (d) | 332 | 194 |
Below is our ownership percentage of certain non-wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Non-wholly-owned subsidiary: | ET Percentage Ownership (e) | ||
Bakken Pipeline | 36.4 | % | |
Bayou Bridge | 60.0 | % | |
Ohio River System | 75.0 | % | |
Permian Express Partners | 87.7 | % | |
Rover | 32.6 | % | |
Others | various |
(a) Adjusted EBITDA of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries reflects the total Adjusted EBITDA of our non-wholly-owned subsidiaries on an aggregated basis. This is the amount of EBITDA included in our consolidated non-GAAP measure of Adjusted EBITDA.
(b) Our proportionate share of Adjusted EBITDA of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries reflects the amount of Adjusted EBITDA of such subsidiaries (on an aggregated basis) that is attributable to our ownership interest.
(c) Distributable Cash Flow of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries reflects the total Distributable Cash Flow of our non-wholly-owned subsidiaries on an aggregated basis.
(d) Our proportionate share of Distributable Cash Flow of non-wholly-owned subsidiaries reflects the amount of Distributable Cash Flow of such subsidiaries (on an aggregated basis) that is attributable to our ownership interest. This is the amount of Distributable Cash Flow included in our consolidated non-GAAP measure of Distributable Cash Flow attributable to the partners of ET.
(e) Our ownership reflects the total economic interest held by us and our subsidiaries. In some cases, this percentage comprises ownership interests held in (or by) multiple entities.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190220005885/en/
Source:
Energy Transfer
Investor Relations:
Bill Baerg, Brent Ratliff, Lyndsay
Hannah, 214-981-0795
or
Media Relations:
Vicki
Granado, 214-840-5820